ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
Heavy metal toxicity, ecological risk assessment, and pollution sources in a hydropower reservoir.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the Heavy Metal Pollution Pattern in Sediments of a Typical Small- and Medium-Sized Reservoir in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heavy metal (HM) toxicity, ecological risk, and pollution sources were analyzed using the pollution indexing and statistical methods in the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR). The average concentration of HM increased in the order of Cr < Ni < As < Cd < Cu < Mn < Pb < Zn < Al < Fe during the recharge period and Cd < Cr < Ni < As < Cu < Pb < Mn < Zn < Al < Fe during the discharge period. Significant spatial variations of Pb, Zn, Cd, As, Mn, Ni, Cr, and Cu were observed at the upstream and downstream sampling sites. Pb sharply increased during the recharge period, ranges (6.93 -148.62 μg/L) and exceeded WHO and USPEA standards limit. HPI, HEI, Cd, WPI indicated low pollution and moderate pollution with the strong influence of Pb and Cd in the discharge and recharging period, respectively. HTML values are below the permissible toxicity load except for Pb. The Pb toxicity removal percentage is 56.47%, suggesting that the lead's toxicity level is high in TGR and requires the removal process. Ecological risk index values indicated that pollution is low in TGR. The potential ecological risk indexes (RI) of 9.07 and 31.60 were obtained for the discharge and recharge period, respectively, indicating low potential ecological risk from heavy metals in TGR. However, RI values revealed that (Pb, Cd, As Cr Ni, Cu Zn, and Mn) were the most ecological risk HMs in TGR. A significant ecological risk of Pb and Cd distribution was observed across the TGR. Multivariate statistical results found that Pb, Cd, Zn, Mn, Ni, As, Cr, Cu mainly originate from industrial wastewater, mining, metals processing, and agricultural runoff. Fe and Al were mainly from bedrock weathering. Pb, Cd, Zn HMs are a threat to the reservoir ecosystem. This study delivered a current status of HM pollution, toxicity, ecological risk, and pollution sources, indicating a vital insight into HM pollution and water security management in the Three Gorges Reservoir.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35020150What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.