Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35020125›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2022

Is Adherence to Follow-Up After Bariatric Surgery Necessary? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Beata M M Reiber, Rosalie Barendregt, Ralph de Vries, Sjoerd C Bruin, Donald L van der Peet

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Towards precision medicine in bariatric surgery prescription.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beata M M ReiberDepartment of Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, de Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. bmmreiber@gmail.com.
Rosalie BarendregtDepartment of Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, de Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ralph de VriesMedical Library, Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sjoerd C BruinDepartment of Bariatric Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.
Donald L van der PeetDepartment of Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, de Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association of adherence to follow-up (FU) after laparoscopic gastric bypass - and gastric sleeve with weight loss (WL) is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate this association. Fourteen full text articles were included in the systematic review. Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis concerning FU up to 3 years postoperatively and 3 for the FU between 3 and 10 years postoperatively. Results showed a significant association between adherence to FU 0.5 to 3 years postoperatively and percentage excess WL (%EWL) but did not demonstrate a significant association between FU > 3 years postoperatively and total WL (%TWL). In conclusion, adherence to FU may not be associated with WL and therefore stringent lifelong FU in its current form should be evaluated.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidFollow-Up StudiesGastrectomyHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossAdherence to follow-upGastric bypassGastric SleeveLong term follow-upShort term follow-upWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID35020125
PMCPMC8866276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.