Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35020020›Full record

ReviewAmino acids2022

Current status of PTMs structural databases: applications, limitations and prospects.

Alexandre G de Brevern, Joseph Rebehmed

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Amino acids, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Editorial.Amino acids · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandre G de BrevernUniversité de Paris, INSERM, UMR_S 1134, DSIMB, 75739, Paris, France.
Joseph RebehmedDepartment of Computer Science and Mathematics, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon. joseph.rebehmed@lau.edu.lb.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0909-6155

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-19-CE17-0021Indo-French Center for the Promotion of Advanced Research / CEFIPRA 5302-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein 3D structures, determined by their amino acid sequences, are the support of major crucial biological functions. Post-translational modifications (PTMs) play an essential role in regulating these functions by altering the physicochemical properties of proteins. By virtue of their importance, several PTM databases have been developed and released in decades, but very few of these databases incorporate real 3D structural data. Since PTMs influence the function of the protein and their aberrant states are frequently implicated in human diseases, providing structural insights to understand the influence and dynamics of PTMs is crucial for unraveling the underlying processes. This review is dedicated to the current status of databases providing 3D structural data on PTM sites in proteins. Some of these databases are general, covering multiple types of PTMs in different organisms, while others are specific to one particular type of PTM, class of proteins or organism. The importance of these databases is illustrated with two major types of in silico applications: predicting PTM sites in proteins using machine learning approaches and investigating protein structure-function relationships involving PTMs. Finally, these databases suffer from multiple problems and care must be taken when analyzing the PTMs data.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteinsDatabases, ProteinHumansMachine LearningProteinsGlycosylationModified amino acidsPhosphorylationPrediction approachesProtein structuresSecondary structuresStructure/function relationship

Identifiers

PMID35020020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.