Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35019995›Full record

Trial reportJournal of rehabilitation medicine2022

Barriers to applying for medical rehabilitation: a time-to-event analysis of employees with severe back pain in Germany.

Julia-Marie Zimmer, David Fauser, André Golla, Andreas Wienke, Nadine Schmitt, Matthias Bethge, Wilfried Mau

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Julia-Marie ZimmerInstitute for Rehabilitation Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany. julia-marie.zimmer@uk-halle.de.
David Fauser
André Golla
Andreas Wienke
Nadine Schmitt
Matthias Bethge
Wilfried Mau
Luther University · KRMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEBirkbeck, University of London · GBUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLongitudinal studies on barriers to applying for rehabilitation in Germany are lacking in light of the suspected underutilization of rehabilitation services. The aim of this study was to examine application behaviour in persons with disabling back pain and to identify relevant predictors for making an application.

designA prospective cohort study with randomized sampling of insurants in the German Pension Insurance, using a questionnaire at baseline and follow-up with linked administrative data for 1.5 years. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Employed persons (age range 45-59 years) with a high degree of limitations due to back pain and a self-reported risk of permanent work disability (not applied for disability pension, no medical rehabilitation within the last 4 years).

methodsMultivariable Cox regression was used to examine the influence of pre-selected variables on making an application in the follow-up period.

resultsOf 690 persons, only 12% applied for rehabilitation. Predictors for making an application were: support from physicians (hazard ratio (HR)=2.24; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.32-3.80), family, and friends (HR=1.67; 95% CI 1.02-2.73), more pain-related disability days (HR=1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.03), and worse work ability (HR=0.86; 95% CI 0.75-0.97). An intention to apply at baseline mediated the effect of family and physician support on the application.

conclusionThe low number of applications for rehabilitation despite disabling back pain indicates access barriers to, and underuse of, medical rehabilitation.

Indexed as

PensionsPersons with DisabilitiesBack PainGermanyHumansMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35019995
PMCPMC9020470
OpenAlexW4206433329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.