Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35019964›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

A Robust Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma for the Common Marmoset.

Sandeep Kumar, Alexandra Benavente-Perez, Reynolds Ablordeppey, Carol Lin, Suresh Viswanathan, Abram Akopian, Stewart A Bloomfield

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modeling complex age-related eye disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Retinal glia in myopia: current understanding and future directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandeep KumarDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, NY, USA.
Alexandra Benavente-PerezDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, NY, USA.
Reynolds AblordeppeyDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, NY, USA.
Carol LinDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, NY, USA.
Suresh ViswanathanDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, NY, USA.
Abram AkopianDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, NY, USA.
Stewart A BloomfieldDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, NY, USA.
SUNY College of Optometry · US

Funding

Functional Roles of Retinal Gap Junctions in Visual ProcessingR01EY007360 · NEI · STATE COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI BLOOMFIELD, STEWART ALLEN · 1988 to 2021
$9.8M
The Role of Gap Junctions in the Progressive Loss of Retinal Neurons in GlaucomaR01EY026024 · NEI · STATE COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI BLOOMFIELD, STEWART ALLEN · 2016 to 2018
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007360NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To establish a robust experimental model of glaucoma in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus), a New World primate, using an intracameral microbead injection technique. Methods: Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) was induced by an injection of polystyrene microbeads. Morphologic changes in the retina and optic nerve of glaucomatous eyes were assessed and electroretinogram (ERG) recordings were performed to evaluate functional changes. Results: Microbead injections induced a sustained IOP elevation for at least 10 weeks in a reproducible manner. At the end of the 10-week experimental period, there was significant loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in all quadrants and eccentricities, although it was more prominent in the mid-peripheral and peripheral regions. This was consistent with a thinning of the Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) seen in spectral domain optical coherence tomography scans. Surviving RGCs showed marked changes in morphology, including somatic shrinkage and dendritic atrophy. Retinas also showed significant gliosis. The amplitude of the ERG photopic negative response, with subsequent a- and b-wave changes, was reduced in glaucomatous eyes. The optic nerve of glaucomatous eyes showed expanded cupping, disorganization of the astrocytic matrix, axonal loss, and gliosis. Conclusions: We developed a robust and reproducible model of glaucoma in the marmoset. The model exhibits both structural and functional alterations of retina and optic nerve characteristic of glaucoma in humans and animal models. Translational Relevance: The glaucoma model in the marmoset described here forms a robust method to study the disease etiology, progression, and potential therapies in a nonhuman primate, allowing for more effective translation of animal data to humans.

Indexed as

CallithrixGlaucomaAnimalsIntraocular PressureMicrospheresRetinal Ganglion Cells

Identifiers

PMID35019964
PMCPMC8762714
OpenAlexW4205896823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.