Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35019849›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Assessment of Natural Language Processing Methods for Ascertaining the Expanded Disability Status Scale Score From the Electronic Health Records of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

Zhen Yang, Chloé Pou-Prom, Ashley Jones, Michaelia Banning, David Dai, Muhammad Mamdani, Jiwon Oh, Tony Antoniou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhen YangData Science and Advanced Analytics, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2405-4092
Chloé Pou-PromData Science and Advanced Analytics, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5719-7786
Ashley JonesDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5636-0716
Michaelia BanningData Science and Advanced Analytics, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3408-3652
David DaiData Science and Advanced Analytics, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9063-7774
Muhammad MamdaniData Science and Advanced Analytics, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5199-6344
Jiwon OhDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5519-6088
Tony AntoniouData Science and Advanced Analytics, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6984-8953

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score is a widely used measure to monitor disability progression in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, extracting and deriving the EDSS score from unstructured electronic health records can be time-consuming.

objectiveWe aimed to compare rule-based and deep learning natural language processing algorithms for detecting and predicting the total EDSS score and EDSS functional system subscores from the electronic health records of patients with MS.

methodsWe studied 17,452 electronic health records of 4906 MS patients followed at one of Canada's largest MS clinics between June 2015 and July 2019. We randomly divided the records into training (80%) and test (20%) data sets, and compared the performance characteristics of 3 natural language processing models. First, we applied a rule-based approach, extracting the EDSS score from sentences containing the keyword "EDSS." Next, we trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to predict the 19 half-step increments of the EDSS score. Finally, we used a combined rule-based-CNN model. For each approach, we determined the accuracy, precision, recall, and F-score compared with the reference standard, which was manually labeled EDSS scores in the clinic database.

resultsOverall, the combined keyword-CNN model demonstrated the best performance, with accuracy, precision, recall, and an F-score of 0.90, 0.83, 0.83, and 0.83 respectively. Respective figures for the rule-based and CNN models individually were 0.57, 0.91, 0.65, and 0.70, and 0.86, 0.70, 0.70, and 0.70. Because of missing data, the model performance for EDSS subscores was lower than that for the total EDSS score. Performance improved when considering notes with known values of the EDSS subscores.

conclusionsA combined keyword-CNN natural language processing model can extract and accurately predict EDSS scores from patient records. This approach can be automated for efficient information extraction in clinical and research settings.

Indexed as

machine learningmultiple sclerosisnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID35019849
PMCPMC8792771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.