Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35019845›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2022

Digital Storytelling for Health-Related Outcomes in Older Adults: Systematic Review.

Jennifer Stargatt, Sunil Bhar, Jahar Bhowmik, Abdullah Al Mahmud

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06569628 (Validation Study of the Implementation of Narrative Care Methodology, Life Stories and Biographies in Long-Term Care Centres for Old-Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06569628 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Validation Study of the Implementation of Narrative Care Methodology, Life Stories and Biographies in Long-Term Care Centres for Old-Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorEnvita Digital Solutions S.L.Ran2024 to 2027Enrolled378ConditionsLong-term Care Centres for Old Adults Users, Relatives of Long-term Care Centres for Old Adults Users, Long-term Care Centres for Old Adults ProfessionalsArmsEnvita Stories Methodology in Long-term care Centres for old adults, Contact Methodology in Long-term Care Centres for old adults
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer StargattDepartment of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2517-3202
Sunil BharDepartment of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9260-7368
Jahar BhowmikDepartment of Health Sciences and Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9697-1968
Abdullah Al MahmudCentre for Design Innovation, School of Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2801-723X
Swinburne University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults face a unique set of challenges and may experience a range of psychological comorbidities. Digital storytelling is an emerging tool for sharing and recording lived experiences and may have the potential to support well-being but is yet to be systematically reviewed for use among older adults.

objectiveThe aim of this review is to examine the methods for creating digital stories, the health-related outcomes associated with creating digital stories, and the potential for implementing digital storytelling with older adults.

methodsWe systematically searched electronic databases to identify articles published in English that reported on at least one health-related outcome of digital storytelling for participants aged ≥60 years. Data were extracted and synthesized using qualitative content analysis and summarized in tables. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

resultsA total of 8 studies were included in the review. Participants were primarily community-dwelling older adults living with dementia, involving family caregivers and professional care staff. Studies have taken various approaches to digital storytelling and reported diverse benefits associated with digital storytelling, including improvements in mood, memory, social engagement, and quality of relationships. Although the potential for implementation was not widely examined, some studies have presented evidence for acceptability and feasibility. Generally, studies were of high quality, despite the absence of comparator groups and confounder analyses.

conclusionsThe evidence reviewed suggests that despite the various approaches taken, digital storytelling shows promise as an effective approach for supporting well-being in older adults.

trial registrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42019145922; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019145922. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/15512.

Indexed as

CommunicationIndependent LivingAgedData CollectionDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansagingdementiadigital storytellingmemorymental healtholder adultsreminiscencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35019845
PMCPMC8792772
OpenAlexW4205473971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.