Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35019773›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

On the Ecological Significance of Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Microbial Populations Undergoing Starvation.

Monika Opalek, Bogna Smug, Michael Doebeli, Dominika Wloch-Salamon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Monika OpalekJagiellonian University, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1414-901X
Bogna SmugMalopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9364-163X
Michael DoebeliDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbiagrid.17091.3e, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5975-5710
Dominika Wloch-SalamonJagiellonian University, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0040-1838

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To persist in variable environments, populations of microorganisms have to survive periods of starvation and be able to restart cell division in nutrient-rich conditions. Typically, starvation signals initiate a transition to a quiescent state in a fraction of individual cells, while the rest of the cells remain nonquiescent. It is widely believed that, while quiescent (Q) cells help the population to survive long starvation, the nonquiescent (NQ) cells are a side effect of imperfect transition. We analyzed the regrowth of starved monocultures of Q and NQ cells compared to that of mixed, heterogeneous cultures from simple and complex starvation environments. Our experiments, as well as mathematical modeling, demonstrate that Q monocultures benefit from better survival during long starvation and from a shorter lag phase after resupply of rich medium. However, when the starvation period is very short, the NQ monocultures outperform Q and mixed cultures due to their short lag phase. In addition, only NQ monocultures benefit from complex starvation environments, where nutrient recycling is possible. Our study suggests that phenotypic heterogeneity in starved populations could be a form of bet hedging that is adaptive when environmental determinants, such as the length of the starvation period, the length of the regrowth phase, and the complexity of the starvation environment, vary over time.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionMicrobial ViabilityModels, TheoreticalPhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiaebet hedgingevolutionary biologymathematical modellingquiescenceS. cerevisiaestarvation

Identifiers

PMID35019773
PMCPMC8754142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.