Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35019699›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Positive Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus EG004 on Cognitive Ability of Healthy Mice by Fecal Microbiome Analysis Using Full-Length 16S-23S rRNA Metagenome Sequencing.

Soomin Jeon, Hyaekang Kim, Jina Kim, Donghyeok Seol, Jinchul Jo, Youngseok Choi, Seoae Cho, Heebal Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic insights and functional evaluation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soomin Jeon *Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyaekang Kim *Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jina KimDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Donghyeok SeolDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9695-5861
Jinchul JoDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Youngseok ChoiDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seoae ChoeGnome, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Heebal KimDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3064-1303
Seoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence for the concept of the "gut-brain axis" (GBA) has risen. Many types of research demonstrated the mechanism of the GBA and the effect of probiotic intake. Although many studies have been reported, most were focused on neurodegenerative disease and, it is still not clear what type of bacterial strains have positive effects. We designed an experiment to discover a strain that positively affects brain function, which can be recognized through changes in cognitive processes using healthy mice. The experimental group consisted of a control group and three probiotic consumption groups, namely, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus. Three experimental groups fed probiotics showed an improved cognitive ability by cognitive-behavioral tests, and the group fed on L. acidophilus showed the highest score. To provide an understanding of the altered microbial composition effect on the brain, we performed full 16S-23S rRNA sequencing using Nanopore, and operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified at species level. In the group fed on L. acidophilus, the intestinal bacterial ratio of

Indexed as

CognitionMetagenomeAnimalsBiodiversityBrain-Gut AxisDisease Models, AnimalFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLactobacillusLactobacillus acidophilusMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeurodegenerative DiseasesProbioticsRNA, Ribosomal, 23SRNA, Ribosomal, 23Scognitive abilitygut-brain axisgut microbiomeLactobacillus acidophilusNanopore sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35019699
PMCPMC8754107
OpenAlexW4205859311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.