Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35019162›Full record

SynthesisClinical cardiology2022

Early and late recurrent cardiovascular events among high-risk patients with an acute coronary syndrome: Meta-analysis of phase III studies and implications on trial design.

Gerald Chi, Jane J Lee, Syed H A Kazmi, Clara Fitzgerald, Sahar Memar Montazerin, Arzu Kalayci, Serge Korjian, Mark Heise, Lawrence I Deckelbaum, Peter Libby and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07290699 (INtensive Cholesterol-Lowering With recatIcimab combiNation in Emergency PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07290699 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

INtensive Cholesterol-Lowering With recatIcimab combiNation in Emergency PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled2,442ConditionsSTEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (MI)ArmsRecaticimab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deciphering Acute Coronary Syndromes Pathobiology Through Proteomics.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gerald ChiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8371-1689
Jane J LeeBaim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Syed H A KazmiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Clara FitzgeraldDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sahar Memar MontazerinDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Arzu KalayciDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Serge KorjianDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mark HeiseCSL Behring, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lawrence I DeckelbaumCSL Behring, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Peter LibbyDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Deepak L BhattDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
C Michael GibsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCSL (United States) · USBaim Institute for Clinical Research · US

Funding

CSL Behring
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering therapies and other standard-of-care therapy, there remains a substantial residual atherosclerotic risk among patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aims to estimate the risk of early and late recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and address its implications on trial design.

methodsA literature search was performed to collect phase III interventional trials on high-risk ACS patients. Pooled event rates at 90 and 360 days were estimated by fitting random-effects models using the DerSimonian-Laird method. Under the assumption of a total sample size of 10,000 and 1:1 allocation at a one-sided alpha of 0.025 using the log-rank test, the relationship between power and relative risk reduction (RRR) or absolute risk reduction (ARR) was explored for early versus late MACE endpoint.

resultsSeven trials representing 82,727 recent ACS patients were analyzed. The pooled rates of recurrent MACE were 4.1% and 8.3% at 90 and 360 days. Approximately 49% of events occurred within the first 90 days. Based on the estimated risks at 90 and 360 days, to attain 90% statistical power, a lower magnitude of RRR is required for late MACE than early MACE (22% vs. 30%), whereas a lower magnitude of ARR is required for early MACE than late MACE (1.2% vs. 1.8%).

conclusionThe initial 90-day window after ACS represents a vulnerable period for recurrent events. From a trial design perspective, determining a clinically important benefit by RRR versus ARR may influence the decision between early and late MACE as the study endpoint.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAtherosclerosisCholesterol, LDLClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHumansResearch DesignRisk FactorsCholesterol, LDLacute coronary syndromeatherosclerosiscoronary artery diseasesecondary preventionthrombosis

Identifiers

PMID35019162
PMCPMC8922536
OpenAlexW4206176389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.