SynthesisClinical cardiology2022
Early and late recurrent cardiovascular events among high-risk patients with an acute coronary syndrome: Meta-analysis of phase III studies and implications on trial design.
Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07290699 (INtensive Cholesterol-Lowering With recatIcimab combiNation in Emergency PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
INtensive Cholesterol-Lowering With recatIcimab combiNation in Emergency PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early and late recurrent cardiovascular events among high-risk patients with an acute coronary syndrome: Meta-analysis of phase III studies and implications on trial design.Clinical cardiology · 2022Pooled it
- Sex/race categories, social determinants, and cardiovascular events in Brazilian adults with diabetes: a longitudinal analysis from ELSA-Brasil.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Article
- The Obesity Paradox in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After PCI for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Twice-daily aspirin for acute coronary syndrome: one too many?European heart journal · 2026Article
- Sedentary Behavior and Cardiac Events and Mortality After Hospitalization for Acute Coronary Syndrome Symptoms: A Prospective Study.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Article
- Deciphering Acute Coronary Syndromes Pathobiology Through Proteomics.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Triglyceride-glucose index: a novel predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events and cerebrovascular events in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Optimisation of lipid-lowering therapy post-Acute Coronary Syndromes: a multidisciplinary, cross-interface novel pharmacy care model within a local cardiac rehabilitation centre.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Understanding the Burden of Myocardial Infarction and Patient Preferences for Treatment: A Real-World Study Assessing Patients' Perspectives via an Online Survey.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2025Article
- CSL112 (Apolipoprotein A-I [Human]) Reduces the Elevation in Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Induced by Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Public Health Relevance of US EPA Air Quality Index Activity Recommendations.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Machine learning models for predicting risks of MACEs for myocardial infarction patients with different VEGFR2 genotypes.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of the CNIC-Polypill Strategy Compared With Separate Monocomponents in Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease in Portugal: The MERCURY Study.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering therapies and other standard-of-care therapy, there remains a substantial residual atherosclerotic risk among patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aims to estimate the risk of early and late recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and address its implications on trial design.
methodsA literature search was performed to collect phase III interventional trials on high-risk ACS patients. Pooled event rates at 90 and 360 days were estimated by fitting random-effects models using the DerSimonian-Laird method. Under the assumption of a total sample size of 10,000 and 1:1 allocation at a one-sided alpha of 0.025 using the log-rank test, the relationship between power and relative risk reduction (RRR) or absolute risk reduction (ARR) was explored for early versus late MACE endpoint.
resultsSeven trials representing 82,727 recent ACS patients were analyzed. The pooled rates of recurrent MACE were 4.1% and 8.3% at 90 and 360 days. Approximately 49% of events occurred within the first 90 days. Based on the estimated risks at 90 and 360 days, to attain 90% statistical power, a lower magnitude of RRR is required for late MACE than early MACE (22% vs. 30%), whereas a lower magnitude of ARR is required for early MACE than late MACE (1.2% vs. 1.8%).
conclusionThe initial 90-day window after ACS represents a vulnerable period for recurrent events. From a trial design perspective, determining a clinically important benefit by RRR versus ARR may influence the decision between early and late MACE as the study endpoint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.