Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35019113›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2022

INTENSIVE CARE UNIT PRESCRIPTIONS MUST FIT RISK FACTORS TO PREVENT STRESS ULCER BLEEDING.

Rodolfo Castro Cesar de Oliveira, Osvaldo Malafaia, Fernando Issamu Tabushi, Carlos Roberto Naufel Junior, Elora Sampaio Lourenco, Felipe Yoshio Tabushi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOME OF PATIENTS ADMITTED TO THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT AFTER ELECTIVE AND EMERGENCY LAPAROTOMY.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rodolfo Castro Cesar de OliveiraMackenzie Evangelical Faculty of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1152-7310
Osvaldo MalafaiaMackenzie Evangelical Faculty of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1829-7071
Fernando Issamu TabushiMackenzie Evangelical Faculty of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3150-2164
Carlos Roberto Naufel JuniorUniversity Evangelical Mackenzie Hospital, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5783-6189
Elora Sampaio LourencoUniversity Evangelical Mackenzie Hospital, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3281-0433
Felipe Yoshio TabushiUniversity Evangelical Mackenzie Hospital, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1837-1195
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · BRHospital Universitário Evangélico de Curitiba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe physiological stress of critically ill patients can trigger several complications, including digestive bleeding due to stress ulcers (DBSU). The use of acid secretion suppressants to reduce their incidence has become widely used, but with the current understanding of the risks of these drugs, their use, as prophylaxis in critically ill patients, is limited to the patients with established risk factors.

aimTo determine the appropriateness of the use of prophylaxis for stress ulcer bleeding in acutely ill patients admitted to intensive care units and to analyze the association of risk factors with adherence to the prophylaxis guideline.

methodsRetrospective, analytical study carried out in three general adult intensive care units. Electronic medical records were analyzed for epidemiological data, risk factors for DBSU, use of stress ulcer prophylaxis, occurrence of any digestive bleeding and confirmed DBSU. The daily analysis of risk factors and prophylaxis use were in accordance with criteria based on the Guidelines of the Portuguese Society of Intensive Care for stress ulcer prophylaxis.

resultsOne hundred and five patients were included. Of the patient days with the opportunity to prescribe prophylaxis, compliance was observed in 95.1%. Of the prescription days, 82.35% were considered to be of appropriate use. Overt digestive bleeding occurred in 3.81% of those included. The occurrence of confirmed DBSU was identified at 0.95%. Multivariate analysis by logistic regression did not identify risk factors independently associated with adherence to the guideline, but identified risk factors with a negative association, which were spinal cord injury (OR 0.02 p <0.01) and shock (OR 0.36 p=0.024).

conclusionThe present study showed a high rate of adherence to stress ulcer prophylaxis, but with inappropriate use still significant. In the indication of prophylaxis, attention should be paid to patients with spinal cord injury and in shock.

Indexed as

Anti-Ulcer AgentsUlcerAdultHumansIntensive Care UnitsPrescriptionsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-Ulcer Agents

Identifiers

PMID35019113
PMCPMC8735203
OpenAlexW4205289809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.