Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35019111›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2022

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TISSULAR RESPONSE AFTER ABDOMINAL WALL REPAIR USING POLYPROPYLENE MESH AND BOVINE PERICARDIUM MESH.

Marina Bakri, Fernanda Christo Lovato, Géssica de Mattos Diosti, Yorgos Luiz Santos de Graça Salles, Paulo Henrique Brites Moreira, Luiz Martins Collaço, Nicolau Gregori Czeczko, Osvaldo Malafaia, Luiz Fernando Kubrusly

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. ONLAY VERSUS SUBLAY TECHNIQUES FOR INCISIONAL HERNIA REPAIR: 30-DAY POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: THE LONG-TERM ASSESSMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN AND QUALITY OF LIFE.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
  8. THE USE OF SURGICAL ADHESIVE AND SUTURE FIXING MESHES TO THE ABDOMINAL WALL: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY IN RATS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marina BakriInstitute for Medical Research, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4184-6996
Fernanda Christo LovatoInstitute for Medical Research, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2560-337X
Géssica de Mattos DiostiInstitute for Medical Research, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9884-1793
Yorgos Luiz Santos de Graça SallesMackenzie Evangelical Faculty of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4461-164X
Paulo Henrique Brites MoreiraInstitute for Medical Research, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0696-0208
Luiz Martins CollaçoMackenzie Evangelical Faculty of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3215-1650
Nicolau Gregori CzeczkoInstitute for Medical Research, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5926-150X
Osvaldo MalafaiaInstitute for Medical Research, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1829-7071
Luiz Fernando KubruslyInstitute for Medical Research, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6546-9841
Faculdade Evangélica do Paraná · BRUniversidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of polypropylene meshes for surgical repair of the abdominal wall contributes to a reduction of the of recurrence rates of hernias or defects. However, its intra-abdominal use comes along with the formation of adhesions and several complications. The study and the search for alternative materials, including bovine pericardium, have been regarded as an option for the correction and treatment of resulting hernias with better adaptations and effectiveness.

aimEvaluating the inflammatory process of the bovine pericardium in comparison with the inflammatory process of synthetic polypropylene mesh.

methodBovine pericardium mesh and polypropylene mesh were placed, both on the same animal. The first group had the mesh removed for analysis on day 20, and the second group on day 40. The variables congestion, granulation, giant cells, necrosis, acute inflammation, chronic inflammation and collagen were analyzed.

resultsAll variables were found in greater numbers as a response to the polypropylene mesh, except for the collagen, which, on day 40, was greater in response to the bovine pericardium mesh.

conclusionThe data in this study suggest that there is less inflammatory reaction in response to bovine pericardium mesh when compared to polypropylene mesh.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallPolypropylenesAnimalsCattlePericardiumSurgical MeshTissue AdhesionsPolypropylenes

Identifiers

PMID35019111
PMCPMC8735132
OpenAlexW4206596899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.