Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35019050›Full record

ReviewRevista de saude publica2022

Response to college students' mental health needs: a rapid review.

Emiliana Maria Grando Gaiotto, Carla Andrea Trapé, Celia Maria Sivalli Campos, Elizabeth Fujimori, Fernanda Campos de Almeida Carrer, Lucia Yassuko Izumi Nichiata, Luciana Cordeiro, Maritsa Carla de Bortoli, Tatiana Yonekura, Tereza Setsuko Toma and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista de saude publica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emiliana Maria Grando GaiottoUniversidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem. Departamento de Enfermagem em Saúde Coletiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1673-7395
Carla Andrea TrapéUniversidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem. Departamento de Enfermagem em Saúde Coletiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3272-6565
Celia Maria Sivalli CamposUniversidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem. Departamento de Enfermagem em Saúde Coletiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1149-9025
Elizabeth FujimoriUniversidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem. Departamento de Enfermagem em Saúde Coletiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7991-0503
Fernanda Campos de Almeida CarrerUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia. Departamento de Odontologia Social. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3745-2759
Lucia Yassuko Izumi NichiataUniversidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem. Departamento de Enfermagem em Saúde Coletiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6515-4404
Luciana CordeiroUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Faculdade de Medicina. Curso de Terapia Ocupacional. Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2912-1087
Maritsa Carla de BortoliSecretaria de Estado da Saúde. Instituto de Saúde. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8236-7233
Tatiana YonekuraHospital do Coração. Laboratório de Implementação do Conhecimento em Saúde. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8271-6691
Tereza Setsuko TomaSecretaria de Estado da Saúde. Instituto de Saúde. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9531-9951
Cassia Baldini SoaresUniversidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem. Departamento de Enfermagem em Saúde Coletiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8457-3775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo present strategic options to support the adoption of mental health strengthening policies for university students in the field of health, to be implemented by university institutions.

methodsRapid review, without period delimitation, with searches carried out from May to June 2020, in 21 sources of bibliographic data, including gray literature. The following keywords were used: mental health, students and university. The selection process prioritized systematic reviews of mental health interventions for university students in health care courses, and also considered other types of review and relevant primary studies.

resultsForty-five studies were included: 34 systematic reviews, an evidence synthesis, an overview, a scope review, three narrative reviews, three experience reports and two opinion articles. The evidence from these studies supported the development of four options: 1) to establish and support policies to strengthen the mental health of students in health care courses; 2) to integrate mental health care programs, expand their offer and facilitate access by students; 3) to promote educational programs and communication strategies related to contemporary psychic suffering and its confrontation, so that students can get to know the services and resources and identify strengthening practices; 4) to continuously monitor and assess the mental health needs of students in health care courses.

conclusionsThe options are challenging and require universities to establish institutional commissions to implement a policy to strengthen the mental health of university students in the health area, with the ability to recognize the different health needs, including manifestations of psychic suffering ; to integrate the university's internal actions with each other and with the services of the Unified Health System; to implement and monitor the actions that make up the mental health policy.

Indexed as

Mental HealthStudentsBrazilDelivery of Health CareHumansUniversities

Identifiers

PMID35019050
PMCPMC8687654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.