Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35018568›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022

Association of State-Imposed Restrictions on Gabapentin with Changes in Prescribing in Medicare.

Jordan S Grauer, John D Cramer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Geographic Variation of Gabapentinoids and Opioids in US Nursing Homes.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jordan S GrauerDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 4201 St Antoine St, UHC 5E, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
John D CramerDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 4201 St Antoine St, UHC 5E, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. jdcramer@med.wayne.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6869-8554
Wayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetween August 2016 and July 2018, three states classified gabapentin as a Schedule V drug and nine states implemented prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) regulation for gabapentin. It is highly unusual for states to take drug regulation into their own hands. The impact of these changes on gabapentin prescribing is unclear.

objectiveTo determine the effect of state-imposed regulation on gabapentin prescribing for Medicare Part D enrollees from 2013 to 2018.

designPopulation-based difference-in-difference(DID) analysis study utilizing the Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File.

participantsAll eligible Medicare Part D prescribers excluding those outside of the fifty states and the District of Columbia were included in our analysis. Prescriber data and key sociodemographic variables were organized by state and year. States with a gabapentin schedule change or PDMP regulation enacted before 2019 were included in the intervention group. For the Schedule V DID analysis, a control group of the ten highest opioid-prescribing states was used.

interventionsStates with gabapentin schedule changes or PDMP regulation before January 1, 2019, were included and compared to control states that did not implement these policies. MAIN MEASURES: Total days' supply of gabapentin per enrollee per year was the primary outcome variable. KEY

resultsThe mean total days' supply of gabapentin per enrollee increased 41% from 19.71 to 27.81 total days' supply per enrollee per year between 2013 and 2018. After adjustment, Schedule V gabapentin regulation resulted in a reduction of 8.37 total days of gabapentin prescribed per enrollee (95% confidence interval of - 10.34 to - 6.39). In contrast, PDMP regulation resulted in a reduction of 1.01 total days of gabapentin prescribed per enrollee (95% confidence interval of - 1.74 to - 0.29).

conclusionsClassifying gabapentin as a Schedule V drug results in substantial reduction in total days prescribed whereas PDMP regulation results in modest reduction.

Indexed as

Medicare Part DPrescription Drug Monitoring ProgramsAgedAnalgesics, OpioidDrug and Narcotic ControlGabapentinHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'United StatesAnalgesics, OpioidGabapentin

Identifiers

PMID35018568
PMCPMC9585149
OpenAlexW4205850898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.