Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35018560›Full record

SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2022

An evidence map and synthesis review with meta-analysis on the risk of incisional hernia in colorectal surgery with standard closure.

C Stabilini, M A Garcia-Urena, F Berrevoet, D Cuccurullo, S Capoccia Giovannini, M Dajko, L Rossi, K Decaestecker, M López Cano

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Diastasis recti is associated with incisional hernia after midline abdominal surgery.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

C StabiliniDepartment of Surgery (DiSC), University of Genoa, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5410-0352
M A Garcia-UrenaFaculty of Health Sciences, Francisco de Vitoria University, Henares University Hospital, Carretera Pozuelo-Majadahonda km 1,8, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain. magurena@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7356-6211
F BerrevoetDepartment of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3575-5345
D CuccurulloDepartment of Surgery, Ospedale Monaldi-Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8902-8058
S Capoccia GiovanniniDepartment of Surgery (DiSC), University of Genoa, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3959-0349
M DajkoGastroenterology and Clinical Oncology Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3749-0675
L RossiDepartment of Surgery (DiSC), University of Genoa, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7341-3194
K DecaesteckerDepartment of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0767-940X
M López CanoAbdominal Wall Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8843-4038

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the incidence of incisional hernia (IH) across various type of incisions in colorectal surgery (CS) creating a map of evidence to define research trends, gaps and areas of future interest.

methodsSystematic review of PubMed and Scopus from 2010 onwards. Studies included both open (OS) and laparoscopic (LS). The primary outcome was incidence of IH 12 months after index procedure, secondary outcomes were the study features and their influence on reported proportion of IH. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled proportions. Meta-regression models were performed to explore heterogeneity.

resultsNinetyone studies were included reporting 6473 IH. The pooled proportions of IH for OS were 0.35 (95% CI 0.27-0.44) I

conclusionMidline laparotomies and stoma reversal sites are at high risk for IH and should be considered in research of preventive strategies of closure. After laparoscopic approach IH happens mainly by extraction sites incisions specially midline and also represent an important area of analysis.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryIncisional HerniaColectomyHerniorrhaphyHumansRisk FactorsAbdominal wall incisionColorectal surgeryEvidence mappingHernia preventionIncisional herniaIncisional hernia riskMidline and off-midline incisionStoma reversal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.