Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35018487›Full record

ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2022

[Smartphone-based fundus photography from the perspective of medical product regulation and IT security].

Wolfgang Lauer, Nicole Rämsch-Günther, Dina Truxius

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wolfgang LauerBundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland. wolfgang.lauer@bfarm.de.
Nicole Rämsch-GüntherBundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland.
Dina TruxiusBundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI), Godesberger Allee 185-189, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices · DEFederal Office for Information Security · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital applications on mobile devices are also becoming more widespread in medicine and increasingly support the diagnostics and treatment. Smartphone-based fundus photography (SBF) is a mobile and cost-effective form of ocular fundus imaging and offers many new applications in healthcare. For its practical implementation there are various adapters that are connected to commercially available smartphones, so that the adapter can be used as an ophthalmoscope with the integration of the smartphone. The use of corresponding software applications and adapters for smartphones poses challenges in terms of both medical product law and IT security, which are discussed in this article from the perspective of the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) and the German Federal Office for Information Security (BSI).

Indexed as

Eye DiseasesSmartphoneDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalHumansPhotographySoftwareBfArMBSIDigital medicineFunduscopyMedical App

Identifiers

PMID35018487
OpenAlexW4206435794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.