Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35018480›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

MRI-derived radiomics analysis improves the noninvasive pretreatment identification of multimodality therapy candidates with early-stage cervical cancer.

Yuan Li, Jing Ren, Jun-Jun Yang, Ying Cao, Chen Xia, Elaine Y P Lee, Bo Chen, Hui Guan, Ya-Fei Qi, Xin Gao and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuan Li *Department of OB&GYN, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jing Ren *Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jun-Jun YangDepartment of OB&GYN, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Ying CaoBeijing Infervision Technology Co., Ltd. 100000, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chen XiaBeijing Infervision Technology Co., Ltd. 100000, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Elaine Y P LeeDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Bo ChenDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hui GuanDepartment of Radiotherapy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Ya-Fei QiDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xin GaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wen TangBeijing Infervision Technology Co., Ltd. 100000, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Kuan ChenBeijing Infervision Technology Co., Ltd. 100000, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zheng-Yu JinDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yong-Lan HeDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China. heyonglan@pumch.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2567-9710
Yang XiangDepartment of OB&GYN, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China. XiangY@pumch.cn.
Hua-Dan XueDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNInferVision (China) · CNQueen Mary Hospital · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of China 81901829the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 3332019032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate a clinical-radiomics model that incorporates radiomics signatures and pretreatment clinicopathological parameters to identify multimodality therapy candidates among patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

methodsBetween January 2017 and February 2021, 235 patients with IB1-IIA1 cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy were enrolled and divided into training (n = 194, training:validation = 8:2) and testing (n = 41) sets according to surgical time. The radiomics features of each patient were extracted from preoperative sagittal T2-weighted images. Significance testing, Pearson correlation analysis, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator were used to select radiomic features associated with multimodality therapy administration. A clinical-radiomics model incorporating radiomics signature, age, 2018 Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, menopausal status, and preoperative biopsy histological type was developed to identify multimodality therapy candidates. A clinical model and a clinical-conventional radiological model were also constructed. A nomogram and decision curve analysis were developed to facilitate clinical application.

resultsThe clinical-radiomics model showed good predictive performance, with an area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity in the testing set of 0.885 (95% confidence interval: 0.781-0.989), 78.9%, and 81.8%, respectively. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of the clinical model and clinical-conventional radiological model were 0.751 (0.603-0.900), 63.2%, and 63.6%, 0.801 (0.661-0.942), 73.7%, and 68.2%, respectively. A decision curve analysis demonstrated that when the threshold probability was > 20%, the clinical-radiomics model or nomogram may be more advantageous than the treat all or treat-none strategy.

conclusionsThe clinical-radiomics model and nomogram can potentially identify multimodality therapy candidates in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. KEY POINTS: • Pretreatment identification of multimodality therapy candidates among patients with early-stage cervical cancer helped to select the optimal primary treatment and reduce severe complication risk and costs. • The clinical-radiomics model achieved a better prediction performance compared with the clinical model and the clinical-conventional radiological model. • An easy-to-use nomogram exhibited good performance for individual preoperative prediction.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansHysterectomyMagnetic Resonance ImagingNomogramsRetrospective StudiesCervical cancerCombined modality therapyMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomicsRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35018480
OpenAlexW4205137082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.