Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35018466›Full record

ReviewTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2022

A review of the role of non-invasive ventilation in critical care responses to COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries: lessons learnt from Baghdad.

Richard Thomas, Mustafa M Abdulateef, Aurelie Godard

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard ThomasMedecins Sans Frontieres, 34 Av. Jean Jaures, Paris, 75019, France.
Mustafa M AbdulateefAl-Shifa centre, Al Kindi Teaching Hospital, Al-Rusafa District, Baghdad, 10045, Iraq.
Aurelie GodardMedecins Sans Frontieres, 34 Av. Jean Jaures, Paris, 75019, France.
Médecins Sans Frontières · FRBaghdad Medical City · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2021, the burden of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic became especially severe in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). With high numbers of patients requiring advanced respiratory support and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), many ICUs were overwhelmed. This problem is particularly pronounced in LMICs, where the availability of intensive care beds may be limited. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been increasingly used in COVID-19, as both a bridge to intubation as well as a definitive treatment. Use of NIV may be a feasible management strategy in settings where performing IMV is not possible on a large scale due to resource constraints. During 2020-2021, Médecins Sans Frontière helped manage a COVID-19 ICU in Baghdad, Iraq. The predominant mode of treatment was NIV. Due to a shortage of intensive care ventilators, NIV was delivered in the majority of cases by home continuous positive airway pressure machines. In total, 709 patients were admitted to the ICU during the study period with an overall mortality of 61.1%. In addition to the ventilation strategy, patients must be treated holistically, with a comprehensive package of critical care. We aim to highlight the role of NIV in this setting and summarise our experiences to assist future critical care projects during the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Noninvasive VentilationCritical CareDeveloping CountriesHumansRespiration, ArtificialSARS-CoV-2COVID-19, CPAPhumanitarianLMICnon-invasive ventilation

Identifiers

PMID35018466
PMCPMC8755392
OpenAlexW4206519531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.