ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Application of the Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Definition for Pediatric Sepsis to Nationally Representative Emergency Department Data.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support in pediatrics.Pediatric research · 2023Review
- Labeling Sepsis: Many Square Pegs into Countless Round Roles.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To compare encounter estimates and demographics of pediatric patients (<18 years) meeting modified Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes (IPSO) criteria for sepsis to cohorts obtained using other criteria for pediatric sepsis from administrative datasets.
methodsWe analyzed data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for 2003-2018. We report encounter estimates, demographics, and treatments among pediatric sepsis events using 3 criteria: modified
resultsThe modified IPSO, explicit, and severe sepsis criteria estimated the yearly encounter rates as 116,200, 27,900, and 56,000 respectively. The modified IPSO sepsis criteria accounted for 0.4% of emergency department encounters, with a high proportion of patients who received antibiotics (99.2%, 95% CI 97.8%-100.0%), intravenous fluids (100.0%, 95% CI 99.9%-100.0%), and blood cultures (98.7%, 95% CI 96.9%-100.0%). The explicit cohort had lower proportions with blood cultures (60.6%, 95% CI 40.4%-80.7%) and antibiotic use (77.0%, 95% CI 63.1%-90.8%), but a high proportion admitted (84.0% 95% CI 73.4%-95.7%). The severe sepsis definition had low proportions with blood cultures (12.7%, 95% CI 6.3%-19.1%) and admission (21.1%, 95% CI 14.5%-27.8%).
conclusionsPediatric sepsis estimates differed based on the criteria used for cohort ascertainment. The modified IPSO sepsis criteria group had higher acuity than the severe sepsis cohort but lower acuity than the cohort identified using the explicit sepsis criteria.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.