ArticlePediatric quality & safety
A Quality Improvement Project to Delay Umbilical Cord Clamping Time.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delayed cord clamping (DCC) has numerous benefits to the neonate, including increased hemoglobin levels, decreased need for red blood cell transfusions, and decreased incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis and intraventricular hemorrhage. A preliminary observational study at our institution demonstrated 12% of the observed deliveries met the DCC standard, defined as umbilical cord clamping at least 30-60 seconds after birth. Therefore, we designed a quality improvement project to increase the percentage of deliveries using DCC.
methodsWe planned a quality improvement project aiming to increase DCC rates on the university obstetrics service. Our interventions included provider education, installation of timers in the delivery suites, and modification to documentation in the electronic health record. We measured our results through the documented status of cord clamping, either: (1) greater than or equal to 30 seconds or (2) less than 30 seconds. We analyzed the DCC rates weekly and compared those results to the DCC goal of 80% of all deliveries.
resultsPostintervention DCC rates were 96% overall. Rates of DCC met our aim of 80% or greater each of the 6 weeks we collected data.
conclusionSimple and inexpensive interventions quickly led to improvements in DCC rates on our university obstetrics service. Our interventions including, provider education, installation of timers in delivery suites, and modification to cord clamping documentation in the electronic health record can be easily instituted at other hospitals. Additionally, the simplicity of this system can produce long-term sustainability of DCC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.