Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35018268›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Lumbar Discectomy With Barricaid Device Implantation in Patients at High Risk of Reherniation: Initial Results From a Postmarket Study.

Pierce Nunley, K Brandon Strenge, Kade Huntsman, Hyun Bae, Christian DiPaola, Allen R T, Andrew Shaw, Rick C Sasso, Ali Araghi, Blake Staub and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Pierce NunleyOrthopaedics, Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, USA.
K Brandon StrengeSpine Surgery, The Orthopaedic Institute of Western Kentucky, Paducah, USA.
Kade HuntsmanSpinal Surgery, Salt Lake Orthopaedic Clinic, Salt Lake City, USA.
Hyun BaeOrthopedic Surgery, Cedar-Sinai, Santa Monica, USA.
Christian DiPaolaOrthopaedics, UMass Memorial Healthcare, Worcester, USA.
Allen R TOrthopaedics, University of California San Diego Health System, San Diego, USA.
Andrew ShawNeurological Surgery, Lyerly Neurosurgery, Jacksonville, USA.
Rick C SassoOrthopaedic Surgery, Indiana Spine Center, Carmel, USA.
Ali AraghiSpine Surgery, The Core Institute, Sun City West, USA.
Blake StaubOrthopaedics, Texas Back Institute, Plano, USA.
Selby ChenNeurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA.
Larry E MillerClinical Research, Miller Scientific, Johnson City, USA.
Michael MusacchioOrthopaedics, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, USA.
Baptist Medical Center Jacksonville · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USFoster-Miller (United States) · USIndiana Spine Group · USJacksonville College · USNorthShore University HealthSystem · USOrthopaedic Institute of Western Kentucky · USSalt Lake Regional Medical Center · USSpine Institute of Louisiana · USTexas Back Institute · USThe Core Institute · USUC San Diego Health System · USUMass Memorial Health Care · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Patients with large defects in the annulus fibrosus following lumbar discectomy have high rates of symptomatic reherniation and reoperation. An FDA randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a bone-anchored device (Barricaid, Intrinsic Therapeutics, Woburn, MA) that occludes the annular defect reported significantly lower risk of symptomatic reherniation and reoperation compared to patients receiving discectomy only. However, results of the Barricaid device in real-world use remain limited.  Methods This was a post-market study to determine the real-world outcomes of the Barricaid device when used in addition to primary lumbar discectomy in patients with large annular defects. Main outcomes included leg pain severity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), adverse events, symptomatic reherniation, and reoperation. Imaging studies were read by an independent imaging core laboratory. This paper reports the initial three-month primary endpoint results from the trial; one-year patient follow-up is ongoing. Results Among 55 patients (mean age 41±13 years, 60% male), the mean percent reduction in leg pain severity was 92%, and the mean percent reduction in ODI score was 79%. The three-month rate of symptomatic reherniation was 3.6% and the rate of reoperation was 1.8%. The serious adverse event rate was 5.5%; no device migrations or fractures were observed.  Conclusion Among patients with large annular defects following lumbar discectomy treated with the Barricaid device in real-world conditions, early results demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in patient symptoms and low rates of symptomatic reherniation, reoperation, and complications, which were comparable to those observed with the device in an FDA-regulated trial.

Indexed as

annular defectbarricaidlumbar discectomylumbar herniationsciatica

Identifiers

PMID35018268
PMCPMC8741419
OpenAlexW4200282231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.