ArticleCancer management and research2022
Deep Learning for the Automatic Diagnosis and Analysis of Bone Metastasis on Bone Scintigrams.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Detection of Primary Malignant Bone Tumors: a Meta-Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI in lung cancer metastasis imaging for diagnosis and prognosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility of No-Code Deep Learning for Diagnosing Bone Metastasis in Bone Scans: A Comparative Study of Teachable Machine and ResNet.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Potential of Artificial Bone Scintigraphy from Early-Phase Bone Scintigraphy Using Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Prospective Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Software-based de-filtering restores quantitative accuracy in Clarity2D-enhanced whole-body bone scintigraphy.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in bone Metastases: A systematic review in guideline adherence of 92 studies.Journal of bone oncology · 2025Review
- Applications of machine learning and deep learning in musculoskeletal medicine: a narrative review.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Metastasis lesion segmentation from bone scintigrams using encoder-decoder architecture model with multi-attention and multi-scale learning.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- AI-Assisted Detection and Localization of Spinal Metastatic Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Deep learning model using planar whole-body bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of skull base invasion in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Improved localization and segmentation of spinal bone metastases in MRI with nnUNet radiomics.Journal of bone oncology · 2024Article
- Clinical performance of deep learning-enhanced ultrafast whole-body scintigraphy in patients with suspected malignancy.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Oncologic Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning Methods in CT Spine Imaging-A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Detection, Management, and Prognosis of Bone Metastasis: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence-based analysis of whole-body bone scintigraphy: The quest for the optimal deep learning algorithm and comparison with human observer performance.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Verification of image quality improvement of low-count bone scintigraphy using deep learning.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Article
- Application of Nuclear Medicine Techniques in Musculoskeletal Infection: Current Trends and Future Prospects.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- ChatGPT and large language models in orthopedics: from education and surgery to research.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2023Review
- ChatGPT-assisted deep learning for diagnosing bone metastasis in bone scans: Bridging the AI Gap for Clinicians.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop an approach for automatically analyzing bone metastases (BMs) on bone scintigrams based on deep learning technology.
methodsThis research included a bone scan classification model, a regional segmentation model, an assessment model for tumor burden and a diagnostic report generation model. Two hundred eighty patients with BMs and 341 patients with non-BMs were involved. Eighty percent of cases were randomly extracted from two groups as training set. Remaining cases were as testing set. A deep residual convolutional neural network with different structures was used to determine whether metastatic bone lesions existed, regions of lesions were automatically segmented. Bone scan tumor burden index (BSTBI) was calculated; finally, diagnostic report could be automatically generated. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of classification model were compared with three physicians with different clinical experience. The Dice coefficient evaluated the effect of segmentation model and compared to the result of nnU-Net model. The correlation between BSTBI and blood alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level was analyzed to verify the efficiency of BSTBI. The performance of report generation model was evaluated by the accuracy of interpretation of report.
resultsIn testing set, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of classification model were 92.59%, 85.51% and 88.62%, respectively. The accuracy showed no statistical difference with moderately and experienced physicians and obviously outperformed the inexperienced. The Dice coefficient of BMs area was 0.7387 in segmentation stage. Based on the whole model frame, our segmentation model outperformed the nnU-Net. BSTBI value changed as the BMs changed. There was a positive correlation between BSTBI and ALP level. The accuracy of report generation model was 78.05%.
conclusionDeep learning based on automatic analysis frameworks for BMs can accurately identify BMs, preliminarily realize a fully automatic analysis process from raw data to report generation. BSTBI can be used as a quantitative evaluation indicator to assess the effect of therapy on BMs in different patients or in the same patient before and after treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.