Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35018121›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2022

Deep Learning for the Automatic Diagnosis and Analysis of Bone Metastasis on Bone Scintigrams.

Simin Liu, Ming Feng, Tingting Qiao, Haidong Cai, Kele Xu, Xiaqing Yu, Wen Jiang, Zhongwei Lv, Yin Wang, Dan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Simin Liu *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-9778-3210
Ming Feng *School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Tingting Qiao *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7536-5846
Haidong CaiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Kele XuNational Key Laboratory of Parallel and Distributed Processing, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Xiaqing YuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Wen JiangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zhongwei LvDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3370-5560
Yin WangSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Dan LiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop an approach for automatically analyzing bone metastases (BMs) on bone scintigrams based on deep learning technology.

methodsThis research included a bone scan classification model, a regional segmentation model, an assessment model for tumor burden and a diagnostic report generation model. Two hundred eighty patients with BMs and 341 patients with non-BMs were involved. Eighty percent of cases were randomly extracted from two groups as training set. Remaining cases were as testing set. A deep residual convolutional neural network with different structures was used to determine whether metastatic bone lesions existed, regions of lesions were automatically segmented. Bone scan tumor burden index (BSTBI) was calculated; finally, diagnostic report could be automatically generated. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of classification model were compared with three physicians with different clinical experience. The Dice coefficient evaluated the effect of segmentation model and compared to the result of nnU-Net model. The correlation between BSTBI and blood alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level was analyzed to verify the efficiency of BSTBI. The performance of report generation model was evaluated by the accuracy of interpretation of report.

resultsIn testing set, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of classification model were 92.59%, 85.51% and 88.62%, respectively. The accuracy showed no statistical difference with moderately and experienced physicians and obviously outperformed the inexperienced. The Dice coefficient of BMs area was 0.7387 in segmentation stage. Based on the whole model frame, our segmentation model outperformed the nnU-Net. BSTBI value changed as the BMs changed. There was a positive correlation between BSTBI and ALP level. The accuracy of report generation model was 78.05%.

conclusionDeep learning based on automatic analysis frameworks for BMs can accurately identify BMs, preliminarily realize a fully automatic analysis process from raw data to report generation. BSTBI can be used as a quantitative evaluation indicator to assess the effect of therapy on BMs in different patients or in the same patient before and after treatment.

Indexed as

automatic report generationbone metastasesbone scintigraphydeep learningtumor burden

Identifiers

PMID35018121
PMCPMC8740774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.