Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35017653›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

Connectivity of Fennoscandian Shield terrestrial deep biosphere microbiomes with surface communities.

George Westmeijer, Maliheh Mehrshad, Stephanie Turner, Linda Alakangas, Varvara Sachpazidou, Carina Bunse, Jarone Pinhassi, Marcelo Ketzer, Mats Åström, Stefan Bertilsson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel thermophilic generaFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

George WestmeijerCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Stuvaregatan 4, 39 231, Kalmar, Sweden. george.westmeijer@lnu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5529-2237
Maliheh MehrshadDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7050, 75 007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Stephanie TurnerCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Stuvaregatan 4, 39 231, Kalmar, Sweden.
Linda AlakangasSwedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (SKB), 57 229, Oskarshamn, Sweden.
Varvara SachpazidouDepartment of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Linnaeus University, 39 231, Kalmar, Sweden.
Carina BunseCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Stuvaregatan 4, 39 231, Kalmar, Sweden.
Jarone PinhassiCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Stuvaregatan 4, 39 231, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6405-1347
Marcelo KetzerDepartment of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Linnaeus University, 39 231, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4796-8177
Mats ÅströmDepartment of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Linnaeus University, 39 231, Kalmar, Sweden.
Stefan BertilssonDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7050, 75 007, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4265-1835
Mark DopsonCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Stuvaregatan 4, 39 231, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9622-3318
Linnaeus University · SESwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DESwedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management (Sweden) · SE

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2018-04311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The deep biosphere is an energy constrained ecosystem yet fosters diverse microbial communities that are key in biogeochemical cycling. Whether microbial communities in deep biosphere groundwaters are shaped by infiltration of allochthonous surface microorganisms or the evolution of autochthonous species remains unresolved. In this study, 16S rRNA gene amplicon analyses showed that few groups of surface microbes infiltrated deep biosphere groundwaters at the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory, Sweden, but that such populations constituted up to 49% of the microbial abundance. The dominant persisting phyla included Patescibacteria, Proteobacteria, and Epsilonbacteraeota. Despite the hydrological connection of the Baltic Sea with the studied groundwaters, infiltrating microbes predominantly originated from deep soil groundwater. Most deep biosphere groundwater populations lacked surface representatives, suggesting that they have evolved from ancient autochthonous populations. We propose that deep biosphere groundwater communities in the Fennoscandian Shield consist of selected infiltrated and indigenous populations adapted to the prevailing conditions.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrobiotaProteobacteriaEcosystemFresh WaterGroundwaterSweden

Identifiers

PMID35017653
PMCPMC8752596
OpenAlexW4206622345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.