Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35017592›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A rapid influenza diagnostic test based on detection of viral neuraminidase activity.

Xuexiang Lin, Xiao-Yu Liu, Bo Zhang, Ai-Qing Qin, Kwok-Min Hui, Kevin Shi, Yang Liu, Don Gabriel, X James Li

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuexiang LinShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Xiao-Yu LiuCellex Incorporated, 76 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Bo ZhangCellex Incorporated, 76 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Ai-Qing QinCellex Incorporated, 76 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Kwok-Min HuiCellex Incorporated, 76 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Kevin ShiCellex Incorporated, 76 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Yang LiuCellex Incorporated, 76 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Don GabrielCellex Incorporated, 76 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
X James LiCellex Incorporated, 76 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA. lix@cellex.com.
Research Triangle Park Foundation · USCellex (United States) · US

Funding

National Institutes of Health, United States AI077117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current methods used for diagnosis of acute infection of pathogens rely on detection of nucleic acids, antigens, or certain classes of antibodies such as IgM. Here we report a virus enzyme assay as an alternative to these methods for detection of acute viral infection. In this method, we used a luciferin derivative as the substrate for detection of the enzyme activity of influenza viral neuraminidase as a means for diagnosis of influenza. The resulting commercial test, the qFLU Dx Test, uses a different supply chain that does not compete with those for the current tests. The assay reagents were formulated as a master mix that accommodated both the neuraminidase and luciferase reactions, thereby enabling rapid and prolonged production of stable light signal in the presence of influenza virus in the sample. The assay was evaluated using depository throat swab specimens. As expected, the assay exhibited similar detection rates for all influenza types and subtypes except for A(H7N9), which exhibited lower detection rate due to lower viral titer in the specimens. When throat swab specimens were diluted with the sample buffer of the test kit and tested with the qFLU Dx Test. The sensitivity and specificity were 82.41% (95% confidence interval: 79.66-85.84%) and 95.39% (95% confidence interval: 94.32-96.46%), respectively, for these diluted specimens in comparison to a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. The uniqueness of the qFLU Dx Test as an enzymatic assay makes it highly complementary with currently available methods.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansInfluenza A Virus, H7N9 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanNeuraminidasePharynxReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificityViral ProteinsNA protein, influenza A virusNeuraminidaseReagent Kits, DiagnosticViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID35017592
PMCPMC8752744
OpenAlexW4205955426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.