Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35017586›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Potential distribution of fall armyworm in Africa and beyond, considering climate change and irrigation patterns.

Bipana Paudel Timilsena, Saliou Niassy, Emily Kimathi, Elfatih M Abdel-Rahman, Irmgard Seidl-Adams, Mark Wamalwa, Henri E Z Tonnang, Sunday Ekesi, David P Hughes, Edwin G Rajotte and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. When crops fail, forests follow: Agricultural shocks and deforestation in Zambia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bipana Paudel TimilsenaChemical Ecology Lab, Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, Orchard Road, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. bipspau@gmail.com.
Saliou NiassyInternational Center for Insect Physiology and Chemical Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Emily KimathiInternational Center for Insect Physiology and Chemical Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Elfatih M Abdel-RahmanInternational Center for Insect Physiology and Chemical Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Irmgard Seidl-AdamsChemical Ecology Lab, Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, Orchard Road, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Mark WamalwaInternational Center for Insect Physiology and Chemical Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Henri E Z TonnangInternational Center for Insect Physiology and Chemical Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sunday EkesiInternational Center for Insect Physiology and Chemical Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
David P HughesChemical Ecology Lab, Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, Orchard Road, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Edwin G RajotteChemical Ecology Lab, Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, Orchard Road, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Sevgan SubramanianInternational Center for Insect Physiology and Chemical Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (FAW), first invaded Africa in 2016 and has since become established in many areas across the continent where it poses a serious threat to food and nutrition security. We re-parameterized the existing CLIMEX model to assess the FAW global invasion threat, emphasizing the risk of transient and permanent population establishment in Africa under current and projected future climates, considering irrigation patterns. FAW can establish itself in almost all countries in eastern and central Africa and a large part of western Africa under the current climate. Climatic barriers, such as heat and dry stresses, may limit the spread of FAW to North and South Africa. Future projections suggest that FAW invasive range will retract from both northern and southern regions towards the equator. However, a large area in eastern and central Africa is projected to have an optimal climate for FAW persistence. These areas will serve as FAW 'hotspots' from where it may migrate to the north and south during favorable seasons and then pose an economic threat. Our projections can be used to identify countries at risk for permanent and transient FAW-population establishment and inform timely integrated pest management interventions under present and future climate in Africa.

Indexed as

Agricultural IrrigationClimate ChangeSpodopteraAfricaAnimalsIntroduced Species

Identifiers

PMID35017586
PMCPMC8752590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.