ArticleScientific reports2022
A computational method for predicting nucleocapsid protein in retroviruses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nucleocapsid protein (NC) in the group-specific antigen (gag) of retrovirus is essential in the interactions of most retroviral gag proteins with RNAs. Computational method to predict NCs would benefit subsequent structure analysis and functional study on them. However, no computational method to predict the exact locations of NCs in retroviruses has been proposed yet. The wide range of length variation of NCs also increases the difficulties. In this paper, a computational method to identify NCs in retroviruses is proposed. All available retrovirus sequences with NC annotations were collected from NCBI. Models based on random forest (RF) and weighted support vector machine (WSVM) were built to predict initiation and termination sites of NCs. Factor analysis scales of generalized amino acid information along with position weight matrix were utilized to generate the feature space. Homology based gene prediction methods were also compared and integrated to bring out better predicting performance. Candidate initiation and termination sites predicted were then combined and screened according to their intervals, decision values and alignment scores. All available gag sequences without NC annotations were scanned with the model to detect putative NCs. Geometric means of sensitivity and specificity generated from prediction of initiation and termination sites under fivefold cross-validation are 0.9900 and 0.9548 respectively. 90.91% of all the collected retrovirus sequences with NC annotations could be predicted totally correct by the model combining WSVM, RF and simple alignment. The composite model performs better than the simplex ones. 235 putative NCs in unannotated gags were detected by the model. Our prediction method performs well on NC recognition and could also be expanded to solve other gene prediction problems, especially those whose training samples have large length variations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.