Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35017439›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2022

Dose optimization of intrathecal administration of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of subacute incomplete spinal cord injury.

Ting-Ting Cao, Huan Chen, Mao Pang, Si-Si Xu, Hui-Quan Wen, Bin Liu, Li-Min Rong, Mang-Mang Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ting-Ting CaoDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Huan ChenDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Mao PangDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery; Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Si-Si XuDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Hui-Quan WenDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Bin LiuDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery; Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Li-Min RongDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery; Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Mang-Mang LiDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Southern Medical University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNKey Laboratory of Guangdong Province · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) are a promising candidate for spinal cord injury (SCI) repair owing to their advantages of low immunogenicity and easy accessibility over other MSC sources. However, modest clinical efficacy hampered the progression of these cells to clinical translation. This discrepancy may be due to many variables, such as cell source, timing of implantation, route of administration, and relevant efficacious cell dose, which are critical factors that affect the efficacy of treatment of patients with SCI. Previously, we have evaluated the safety and efficacy of 4 × 10

Indexed as

effective dosehuman umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cellsintrathecal implantationion channelsneurotransmitter receptorsspinal cord injurysubacute spinal cord injuryγ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA

Identifiers

PMID35017439
PMCPMC8820722
OpenAlexW4200481308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.