ArticleBMJ open2022
'When will this end? Will it end?' The impact of the March-June 2020 UK COVID-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.Journal of affective disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Protective factors for maternal mental health and life satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Associations between pre-pandemic housing insecurity and reports of anxiety and depression in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of the All of Us Research Program cohort.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Staying isolated indoors means that nobody sees me": ontological (in)security and living with significant appearance concerns before, during, and 'since' COVID-19.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024Article
- Change, Adversity, and Adaptation: Young People's Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic Expressed through Artwork and Semi-Structured Interviews.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Freedom for some, but not for Mum: the reproductive injustice associated with pandemic 'Freedom Day' for perinatal women in the United Kingdom.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Perceived social support and characteristics of social networks of families with children with special healthcare needs following the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- 'It feels smaller now': The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on apartment residents and their living environment - A longitudinal study.Journal of environmental psychology · 2023Article
- Trends in Language Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Relationship Between Language Use and Mental Health: Text Analysis Based on Free Responses From a Longitudinal Study.JMIR mental health · 2023Article
- Longitudinal impact of the COVID19 pandemic on mental health in a general population sample in France: Evidence from the COMET Study.Journal of affective disorders · 2023Article
- Article
- A Case of New-Onset Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Schizophrenia in a 14-Year-Old Male following the COVID-19 Pandemic.Case reports in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Exploring the beliefs and experiences with regard to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance in a slum of Karachi, Pakistan.Health promotion international · 2022Article
- The longitudinal effects of stress and fear on psychiatric symptoms in mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic.Archives of women's mental health · 2022Article
- The Impact of the Pandemic on Mental Health in Ethnically Diverse Mothers: Findings from the Born in Bradford, Tower Hamlets and Newham COVID-19 Research Programmes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Top ten public health challenges to track in 2022.Public health challenges · 2022Article
- The Effect of Pandemic-Related Economic Disruption on Young Adolescents in Ireland.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The mental health of staff working on intensive care units over the COVID-19 winter surge of 2020 in England: a cross sectional survey.British journal of anaesthesia · 2022Article
- Growing up during a public health crisis: a qualitative study of Born in Bradford early adolescents during Covid-19.BMC psychology · 2022Article
- Changes in children's wellbeing in Bradford during COVID-19: The Born in Bradford COVID-19 longitudinal research study.Wellcome open research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo explore clinically important increases in depression/anxiety from before to during the first UK COVID-19 lockdown and factors related to this change, with a particular focus on ethnic differences.
designPre-COVID-19 and lockdown surveys nested within two longitudinal Born in Bradford cohort studies.
participants1860 mothers with a child aged 0-5 or 9-13, 48% Pakistani heritage.
main outcome measuresORs for a clinically important increase (5 points or more) in depression (eight item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)) and anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7)) in unadjusted regression analyses, repeated with exposures of interest separated by ethnicity to look for differences in magnitude of associations, and lived experience of mothers captured in open text questions.
resultsThe number of women reporting clinically important depression/anxiety increased from 11% to 20% (95% CI 10%-13%; 18%-22%) and from 10% to 16% (95% CI 8%-11%; 15%-18%), respectively. Increases in depression/anxiety were associated with loneliness (OR=8.37, 95% CI 5.70 to 12.27; 8.50, 95% CI 5.71 to 12.65, respectively); financial (6.23, 95% CI 3.96 to 9.80; 6.03, 95% CI 3.82 to 9.51), food (3.33, 95% CI 2.09 to 5.28; 3.46, 95% CI 2.15 to 5.58) and housing insecurity (3.29, 95% CI 2.36 to 4.58; 3.0, 95% CI 2.11 to 4.25); a lack of physical activity (3.13, 95% CI 2.15 to 4.56; 2.55, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.78); and a poor partner relationship (3.6, 95% CI 2.44 to 5.43; 5.1, 95% CI 3.37 to 7.62). The magnitude of associations between key exposures and worsening mental health varied between ethnic groups.Responses to open text questions illustrated a complex interplay of challenges contributing to mental ill health including: acute health anxieties; the mental load of managing multiple responsibilities; loss of social support and coping strategies; pressures of financial and employment insecurity; and being unable to switch off from the pandemic.
conclusionsMental ill health has worsened for many during the COVID-19 lockdown, particularly in those who are lonely and economically insecure. The magnitude of associations between key exposures and worsening mental health varied between ethnic groups. Mental health problems may have longer term consequences for public health and interventions that address the potential causes are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.