Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35016819›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2022

Investigation of biases in convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation using performance sensitivity analysis.

Daniel Güllmar, Nina Jacobsen, Andreas Deistung, Dagmar Timmann, Stefan Ropele, Jürgen R Reichenbach

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel GüllmarMedical Physics Group, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany. Electronic address: daniel.guellmar@med.uni-jena.de.
Nina JacobsenMedical Physics Group, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany.
Andreas DeistungUniversity Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Radiology, Department for Radiation Medicine, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Germany.
Dagmar TimmannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Stefan RopeleDepartment of Neurology, Karl-Franzens University of Graz, Austria.
Jürgen R ReichenbachMedical Physics Group, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany; Michael Stifel Center Jena for Data-Driven and Simulation Science, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of deep neural networks for segmentation in medical imaging has gained substantial interest in recent years. In many cases, this variant of machine learning has been shown to outperform other conventional segmentation approaches. However, little is known about its general applicability. Especially the robustness against image modifications (e.g., intensity variations, contrast variations, spatial alignment) has hardly been investigated. Data augmentation is often used to compensate for sensitivity to such changes, although its effectiveness has not yet been studied. Therefore, the goal of this study was to systematically investigate the sensitivity to variations in input data with respect to segmentation of medical images using deep learning. This approach was tested with two publicly available segmentation frameworks (DeepMedic and TractSeg). In the case of DeepMedic, the performance was tested using ground truth data, while in the case of TractSeg, the STAPLE technique was employed. In both cases, sensitivity analysis revealed significant dependence of the segmentation performance on input variations. The effects of different data augmentation strategies were also shown, making this type of analysis a useful tool for selecting the right parameters for augmentation. The proposed analysis should be applied to any deep learning image segmentation approach, unless the assessment of sensitivity to input variations can be directly derived from the network.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSemanticsBiasMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerConvolutional neural networkData augmentationSemantic image segmentationSensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID35016819
PMCPMC9948839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.