Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35016712›Full record

ArticleBiology of sex differences2022

Sex differences in sucrose reinforcement in Long-Evans rats.

Jeffrey W Grimm, Katherine North, Madeleine Hopkins, Kyle Jiganti, Alex McCoy, Josef Šulc, Derek MacDougall, Frances Sauter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sex differences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. On the importance of including both sexes in animal studies - insights from home-cage monitoring.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. dCA1 cells encode and update contextual place preference.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Reduction in Reward-Driven Behavior Depends on the Basolateral But Not Central Nucleus of the Amygdala in Female Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Kappa-opioid receptor stimulation in the nucleus accumbens shell and ethanol drinking: Differential effects by rostro-caudal location and level of drinking.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeffrey W GrimmDepartment of Psychology and Program in Behavioral Neuroscience, Western Washington University, 516 High Street, Bellingham, WA, 98225-9172, USA. jeff.grimm@wwu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5316-5659
Katherine NorthDepartment of Psychology and Program in Behavioral Neuroscience, Western Washington University, 516 High Street, Bellingham, WA, 98225-9172, USA.
Madeleine HopkinsDepartment of Psychology and Program in Behavioral Neuroscience, Western Washington University, 516 High Street, Bellingham, WA, 98225-9172, USA.
Kyle JigantiDepartment of Psychology and Program in Behavioral Neuroscience, Western Washington University, 516 High Street, Bellingham, WA, 98225-9172, USA.
Alex McCoyDepartment of Psychology and Program in Behavioral Neuroscience, Western Washington University, 516 High Street, Bellingham, WA, 98225-9172, USA.
Josef ŠulcDepartment of Psychology and Program in Behavioral Neuroscience, Western Washington University, 516 High Street, Bellingham, WA, 98225-9172, USA.
Derek MacDougallDepartment of Psychology and Program in Behavioral Neuroscience, Western Washington University, 516 High Street, Bellingham, WA, 98225-9172, USA.
Frances SauterDepartment of Psychology and Program in Behavioral Neuroscience, Western Washington University, 516 High Street, Bellingham, WA, 98225-9172, USA.

Funding

Sex Differences in the Effects of Environmental Enrichment on CravingR15DA016285 · NIDA · WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRIMM, JEFFREY W · 2003 to 2019
$1.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R15 DA016285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are sex differences in addiction behaviors. To develop a pre-clinical animal model to investigate this, the present study examined sex differences in sucrose taking and seeking using Long-Evans rats.

methodsFive experiments were conducted using separate groups of subjects. The first two examined sucrose or saccharin preference in two-bottle home cage choice tests. Experiment three assessed sucrose intake in a binge model with sucrose available in home cage bottles. Experiments four and five utilized operant-based procedures. In experiment four rats responded for sucrose on fixed and progressive ratio (FR, PR) schedules of reinforcement over a range of concentrations of sucrose. A final component of experiment four was measuring seeking in the absence of sucrose challenged with the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390. Experiment five assessed responding for water on FR and PR schedules of reinforcement.

resultsWhen accounting for body weight, female rats consumed more sucrose than water; but there was no sex difference in saccharin preference over a range of saccharin concentrations. When accounting for body weight, females consumed more sucrose than males in the binge model, and only females increased binge intake over 14 days of the study. Females responded at higher rates for sucrose under both FR and PR schedules of reinforcement. Females responded at higher rates in extinction (seeking); SCH23390 reduced sucrose seeking of both females and males. Females responded at higher rates for water on FR and PR schedules than males, although rates of responding were low and decreased over sessions.

conclusionsAcross bottle-choice, binge intake, and operant procedures, female Long-Evans rats consumed more sucrose and responded at higher rates for sucrose. Although females also responded more for water, the vigor of responding did not explain the consistent sex difference in sucrose taking and seeking. The sex difference in sucrose taking was also not explained by sweet preference, as there was no sex difference in saccharin preference. These data provide a pre-clinical model to further evaluate sex differences in addiction behaviors and manipulations designed to reduce them.

Indexed as

SaccharinSucroseAnimalsBody WeightFemaleHumansMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansReinforcement ScheduleSelf AdministrationSex CharacteristicsWaterSaccharinSucroseWaterCravingCue-reactivityDopamineFoodMotivationRelapseSex-differenceSucrose

Identifiers

PMID35016712
PMCPMC8753819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.