ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021
The current status, attitudes, and practices concerning maternal pertussis vaccination in obstetric delivery facilities in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan: a questionnaire survey.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Review
- Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among the General Population in Japan from Public Health Ethical Perspectives: Findings from a Narrative Review.Asian bioethics review · 2025Article
- Review
- Maternal vaccination-current status, challenges, and opportunities.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the implementation status, attitudes, and practices regarding maternal pertussis vaccination in delivery facilities in Kanagawa, Japan. We conducted a questionnaire survey of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy at 125 delivery service facilities, excluding midwifery clinics, in Kanagawa Prefecture from June 18 to July 20, 2020. The questionnaire comprised multiple-choice items, with single or multiple answers depending on the question. Of the 125 facilities surveyed, valid responses were obtained from 72 facilities (58%). There were 41 primary clinics with birthing facilities (57%), 16 general hospitals (not designated perinatal centers) (22%), 10 regional perinatal centers (14%), and five tertiary perinatal centers (7%). None of the facilities administered pertussis vaccination during pregnancy. Forty facilities (56%) reported knowledge of the severity of neonatal and infant pertussis infections. Twenty-three facilities (32%) reported knowledge of the prevention of pertussis infection by vaccination during pregnancy. All facilities reported willingness to consider vaccination if included in the Japanese guidelines. In Japan, the pertussis vaccination during pregnancy is not highly practiced by obstetricians; thus, it is not as popular as in other countries. Further studies are needed to promote strategies to prevent pertussis infection in the neonatal and infant periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.