Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35016250›Full record

ArticleSeminars in neurology2022

Digital Phenotyping in Clinical Neurology.

Anoopum S Gupta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Seminars in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
130.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Sensitive Quantification of Cerebellar Speech Abnormalities Using Deep Learning Models.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The visualization of Orphadata neurology phenotypes.Frontiers in digital health · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anoopum S GuptaDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-8741-0621
Harvard University · US

Funding

A Computational Approach for Quantifying Motor Behaviors in Spinocerebellar Ataxias to Improve Early Detection of Motor Signs and Precisely Estimate Disease Severity and Disease ChangeR01NS117826 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GUPTA, ANOOPUM SATYAWAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS117826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internet-connected devices, including personal computers, smartphones, smartwatches, and voice assistants, have evolved into powerful multisensor technologies that billions of people interact with daily to connect with friends and colleagues, access and share information, purchase goods, play games, and navigate their environment. Digital phenotyping taps into the data streams captured by these devices to characterize and understand health and disease. The purpose of this article is to summarize opportunities for digital phenotyping in neurology, review studies using everyday technologies to obtain motor and cognitive information, and provide a perspective on how neurologists can embrace and accelerate progress in this emerging field.

Indexed as

NeurologySmartphoneHumansNeurologists

Identifiers

PMID35016250
PMCPMC9117425
OpenAlexW4206450794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.