Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35016172›Full record

Observational studyBlood purification2022

Effect of Expanded Hemodialysis with Theranova® in Patients with COVID-19.

María Luisa Serrano Salazar, Jose Portolés, Maria de Valdenebro Recio, Silvia Rosado Garcia, Maria Del Rosario Llópez Carratalá, Francisco A Bernabeu-Andreu, Antonio J Sánchez-López, Paula López-Sánchez

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Blood purification, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Expanded hemodialysis: what's up, Doc?Clinical kidney journal · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

María Luisa Serrano SalazarNephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
Jose PortolésNephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
Maria de Valdenebro RecioNephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
Silvia Rosado GarciaBiobank Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Puerta de Hierro-Segovia de Arana (IDIPHISA), Madrid, Spain.
Maria Del Rosario Llópez CarrataláNephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco A Bernabeu-AndreuBiochemistry and Clinical Analyses Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio J Sánchez-LópezBiobank Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Puerta de Hierro-Segovia de Arana (IDIPHISA), Madrid, Spain.
Paula López-SánchezNephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain, registro.gcdp@yahoo.es.
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCytokine storm control is the main target for improving severe COVID-19 by using immunosuppressive treatment. Effective renal replacement therapy (RRT) could give us an advantage removing cytokines in patients with RRT requirements superimposed on COVID-19.

methodsThis is a prospective observational study in COVID-19 patients who required hemodialysis (HD). Patients were assigned to online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and expanded HD (HDx) according to Brescia group recommendations. We measured several cytokines, β2 microglobulin and albumin levels pre/post-dialysis and on 1st-2nd week. We compared levels among both techniques and control group (HD without COVID-19).

resultsWe included 26 patients: 18 with COVID-19 on RRT (5 of them had acute kidney injury [AKI]) and 8 controls. We confirm higher cytokine levels in COVID-19 patients than controls and even higher in patients with AKI than in those with chronic kidney disease. Most cytokines raised during HD session, except IL-10 and TNFα. IL-10 was eliminated by any dialysis technique, while clearance of TNFα was higher in the HDx group. HDx achieved a deeper normalization of cytokines and β2 microglobulin reduction. Mortality was higher in the OL-HDF group than the HDx group. DISCUSSION: Not all cytokines behave equally along HD session. The following characteristics should be taken into account, such as intrinsic kinetic profile during a HD session. HDx seems to get better performance, probably due to the combination of different factors; however, we did not reach statistical significance due to the small sample size, dropout, and reduction of AKI incidence during the 2nd pandemic wave.

conclusionHDx appears to provide better clearance for TNFα and β2 microglobulin during HD session and associates lower mortality. We propose the HDx technique for COVID-19 patients with RRT requirements since it seems to be safe and more effective than OL-HDF. Further studies are still needed, but we hope that our preliminary data may help us in future pandemic waves of SARS-CoV-2 or other viruses still to come.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryCOVID-19HemodiafiltrationKidney Failure, ChronicAlbuminsHumansInterleukin-10Renal DialysisSARS-CoV-2Tumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAlbuminsInterleukin-10Tumor Necrosis Factor-alphaCOVID-19CytokineExpanded hemodialysisKidney disease

Identifiers

PMID35016172
PMCPMC8805048
OpenAlexW4206613679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.