Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35016058›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2022

SMC complexes: Lifting the lid on loop extrusion.

Torahiko L Higashi, Frank Uhlmann

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ChIA-PET Analysis for Investigating SMC-Mediated 3D Genomic Contacts.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Structural biology of SMC complexes across the tree of life.Current opinion in structural biology · 2023
    Review
  20. DNA segment capture by Smc5/6 holocomplexes.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Torahiko L HigashiChromosome Segregation Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK; Department of Cellular Biochemistry, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Frank UhlmannChromosome Segregation Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK. Electronic address: frank.uhlmann@crick.ac.uk.
Kyushu University · JPThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15671Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust FC001198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loop extrusion has emerged as a prominent hypothesis for how SMC complexes shape chromosomes - single molecule in vitro observations have yielded fascinating images of this process. When not extruding loops, SMC complexes are known to topologically entrap one or more DNAs. Here, we review how structural insight into the SMC complex cohesin has led to a molecular framework for both activities: a Brownian ratchet motion, associated with topological DNA entry, might repeat itself to elicit loop extrusion. After contrasting alternative loop extrusion models, we explore whether topological loading or loop extrusion is more adept at explaining in vivo SMC complex function. SMC variants that experimentally separate topological loading from loop extrusion will in the future probe their respective contributions to chromosome biology.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle ProteinsChromatinChromosomesDNACell Cycle ProteinsChromatinDNA

Identifiers

PMID35016058
PMCPMC9089308
OpenAlexW4205107526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.