Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35015762›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Modelling the balance of care: Impact of an evidence-informed policy on a mental health ecosystem.

Nerea Almeda, Carlos R Garcia-Alonso, Mencia R Gutierrez-Colosia, Jose A Salinas-Perez, Alvaro Iruin-Sanz, Luis Salvador-Carulla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nerea AlmedaDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6477-5142
Carlos R Garcia-AlonsoDepartment of Quantitative Methods, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Spain.
Mencia R Gutierrez-ColosiaDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Spain.
Jose A Salinas-PerezDepartment of Quantitative Methods, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8533-9342
Alvaro Iruin-SanzInstituto Biodonostia, Red de Salud Mental Extrahospitalaria de Gipuzkoa, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Luis Salvador-CarullaCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, ANU College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5742-9866
Universidad Loyola Andalucía · ESAustralian National University · AUBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major efforts worldwide have been made to provide balanced Mental Health (MH) care. Any integrated MH ecosystem includes hospital and community-based care, highlighting the role of outpatient care in reducing relapses and readmissions. This study aimed (i) to identify potential expert-based causal relationships between inpatient and outpatient care variables, (ii) to assess them by using statistical procedures, and finally (iii) to assess the potential impact of a specific policy enhancing the MH care balance on real ecosystem performance. Causal relationships (Bayesian network) between inpatient and outpatient care variables were defined by expert knowledge and confirmed by using multivariate linear regression (generalized least squares). Based on the Bayesian network and regression results, a decision support system that combines data envelopment analysis, Monte Carlo simulation and fuzzy inference was used to assess the potential impact of the designed policy. As expected, there were strong statistical relationships between outpatient and inpatient care variables, which preliminarily confirmed their potential and a priori causal nature. The global impact of the proposed policy on the ecosystem was positive in terms of efficiency assessment, stability and entropy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that formalized expert-based causal relationships between inpatient and outpatient care variables. These relationships, structured by a Bayesian network, can be used for designing evidence-informed policies trying to balance MH care provision. By integrating causal models and statistical analysis, decision support systems are useful tools to support evidence-informed planning and decision making, as they allow us to predict the potential impact of specific policies on the ecosystem prior to its real application, reducing the risk and considering the population's needs and scientific findings.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesModels, TheoreticalBayes TheoremHealth PolicyHumansInpatientsLength of StaySpain

Identifiers

PMID35015762
PMCPMC8752022
OpenAlexW4205609101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.