ArticleJournal of intellectual disabilities : JOID2023
Advancing inclusive research with people with profound and multiple learning disabilities through a sensory-dialogical approach.
Article in Journal of intellectual disabilities : JOID, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Studying the Experiences of Children With Moderate to Profound Intellectual Disabilities in Research: A Systematic Review.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2026Pooled it
- Empowerment of Youth With Intellectual Disabilities Through Inclusive Research in Africa.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026Article
- Applying adaptive research methods to explore health literacy in young people with intellectual disability.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- From Methodological Challenges to Recommendations for Future Practice: Lessons From an Ethnographic Study With People With Intellectual Disabilities.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026Article
- Using Supporters to Increase Participation in Qualitative Research Interviews by People With Intellectual Disabilities.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025Article
- Pushing the boundaries of digital social contact: Experiences of people with disabilities and their social networks during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of intellectual disabilities : JOID · 2024Article
- Self-reported explanations for self-injury by people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review of qualitative studies.International journal of developmental disabilities · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with profound and multiple learning disabilities are often excluded from the processes of knowledge production and face barriers to inclusion in research due to cognitive and communicative challenges. Inclusive research-even when intending to be inclusive-tends to operate within criteria that exclude people with profound and multiple learning disabilities. The aim of this article is to provide a state-of-the-art review of the topic of inclusive research involving people with profound disabilities and thereby challenge traditional assumptions of inclusive research. The review presents themes that will inform a discussion on how to challenge the criteria in ways that make it possible to understand inclusive research for people who communicate in unconventional ways. We argue that a fruitful way of rethinking inclusive research is by applying a sensory-dialogical approach that privileges the dialogical and sensory foundations of the research. We suggest this might be a way to understand inclusive research that regards the person's communicative and cognitive distinctiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.