ArticleWorld psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)2022
The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta-analytic evaluation of recent meta-analyses.
Article in World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06856161 (A Novel Blood Test as a Differential Diagnosis and Drug Efficacy Biomarker in Mental Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 207 papers, 27 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Novel Blood Test as a Differential Diagnosis and Drug Efficacy Biomarker in Mental Health
Who cites it
207 citing papers in PubMed, 27 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluating the impact of pharmacists in outpatient mental health settings: a systematic review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Pooled it
- Psychotherapy, Antidepressants, and Combined Treatment for Depression: A Network Meta-Analysis on Social Functioning Outcomes.Psychotherapy and psychosomatics · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for adults with substance use disorder that have a co-occurring mental health disorder: an umbrella review and illustrative cost-effectiveness analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Socioenvironmental determinants of polypharmacy in mental health disorders: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Magnitude of response in treatment and control groups within psychedelic trials for psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026Pooled it
- The effectiveness of second-generation mindfulness interventions on anxiety and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical psychology review · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Milk Fat Globule Membrane Supplementation for Mental Well-Being.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- Long-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Depression and anxiety · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided versus unguided antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: new insights from subgroup and cumulative meta-analyses.BMJ mental health · 2025Pooled it
- The oro- and nasopharyngeal microbiota as a revolutionary perspective on mental disorders and related psychopathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Antidepressant efficacy of administering repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with psychological and other non-pharmacological methods: a scoping review and meta-analysis.Psychological medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of acupuncture on somatic symptom disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The effects of clinical supervision on supervisees and patient outcomes in psychotherapy - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- The effects of L-theanine supplementation on the outcomes of patients with mental disorders: a systematic review.BMC psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- In the new era of psychedelic assisted therapy: A systematic review of study methodology in randomized controlled trials.Psychopharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Is There a Burnout Epidemic among Medical Students? Results from a Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- Status and trends of TMS research in depressive disorder: a bibliometric and visual analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Does acupuncture treatment modulate inflammatory cytokines in rodent models of depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Enduring effects of psychotherapy, antidepressants and their combination for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
147 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental disorders represent a worldwide public health concern. Psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies are recommended as first line treatments. However, evidence has emerged that their efficacy may be overestimated, due to a variety of shortcomings in clinical trials (e.g., publication bias, weak control conditions such as waiting list). We performed an umbrella review of recent meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for the main mental disorders in adults. We selected meta-analyses that formally assessed risk of bias or quality of studies, excluded weak comparators, and used effect sizes for target symptoms as primary outcome. We searched PubMed and PsycINFO and individual records of the Cochrane Library for meta-analyses published between January 2014 and March 2021 comparing psychotherapies or pharmacotherapies with placebo or treatment-as-usual (TAU), or psychotherapies vs. pharmacotherapies head-to-head, or the combination of psychotherapy with pharmacotherapy to either monotherapy. One hundred and two meta-analyses, encompassing 3,782 RCTs and 650,514 patients, were included, covering depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, somatoform disorders, eating disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, substance use disorders, insomnia, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and bipolar disorder. Across disorders and treatments, the majority of effect sizes for target symptoms were small. A random effect meta-analytic evaluation of the effect sizes reported by the largest meta-analyses per disorder yielded a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.26-0.42) for psychotherapies and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.32-0.41) for pharmacotherapies compared with placebo or TAU. The SMD for head-to-head comparisons of psychotherapies vs. pharmacotherapies was 0.11 (95% CI: -0.05 to 0.26). The SMD for the combined treatment compared with either monotherapy was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.19-0.44). Risk of bias was often high. After more than half a century of research, thousands of RCTs and millions of invested funds, the effect sizes of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders are limited, suggesting a ceiling effect for treatment research as presently conducted. A paradigm shift in research seems to be required to achieve further progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.