SynthesisAmerican journal of hematology2022
Association of clonal hematopoiesis mutations with clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in American journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential as a prognostic factor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood advances · 2024Pooled it
- Association of clonal hematopoiesis mutations with clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.American journal of hematology · 2022Pooled it
- Large clones of clonal hematopoiesis affect outcome in mantle cell lymphoma: results from the FIL MCL0208 clinical trial.Blood advances · 2025Trial
- Red Blood Cell Distribution Width Is a Biomarker of Red Cell Dysfunction Associated with Inflammation, Macrophage Polarization, and Coronary Artery Calcification: A Prognostic Marker in Cardiovascular Disease and a Potential Target for Anti-Cytokine Therapy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Adverse Early-Life Factors Associated with Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential in Later Life.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Association Between Clonal Hematopoiesis and Cardiometabolic Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JACC. CardioOncology · 2026Article
- Prime time for the use of statins in MPNs: from comorbidity drugs to disease-modifying partners.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Clinical decisions in clonal hematopoiesis: a contemporary review for clinicians.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Clonal Hematopoiesis (CHIP) in Pulmonary Embolism and CTEPH: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Risk Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Hematopoietic stem cell aging promotesResearch square · 2026Article
- The JAK2V617F and CALR mutations and risk of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and all-cause mortality.Journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence and impact of additional CHIP mutations in JAK2V617F-positive ischaemic cerebrovascular patients.British journal of haematology · 2025Observational
- Clonal hematopoiesis in AML long-term survivors: Risk factors and clinical consequences.HemaSphere · 2025Article
- Reevaluating Anti-Inflammatory Therapy: Targeting Senescence to Balance Anti-Cancer Efficacy and Vascular Disease.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2025Review
- Impact of cancer therapy on clonal hematopoiesis mutations and subsequent clinical outcomes.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Review
- Somatic and Germline Variants and Coronary Heart Disease in a Chinese Population.JAMA cardiology · 2024Article
- Tissue mosaicism following stem cell aging: blood as an exemplar.Nature aging · 2024Review
- Causes of Clonal Hematopoiesis: a Review.Current oncology reports · 2023Review
- Clonal hematopoiesis, somatic mosaicism, and age-associated disease.Physiological reviews · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) mutations are common among individuals without known hematologic disease. CH mutations have been associated with numerous adverse clinical outcomes across many different studies. We systematically reviewed the available literature for clinical outcomes associated with CH mutations in patients without hematologic disease. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus for eligible studies. Three investigators independently extracted the data, and each study was verified by a second author. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We identified 32 studies with 56 cohorts that examine the association between CH mutations and clinical outcomes. We conducted meta-analyses comparing outcomes among individuals with and without detectable CH mutations. We conducted meta-analyses for cardiovascular diseases (nine studies; HR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.26-2.07, p = .0002), hematologic malignancies (seven studies; HR = 5.59, 95% CI = 3.31-9.45, p < .0001), therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (four studies; HR = 7.55, 95% CI = 4.3-13.57, p < .001), and death (nine studies; HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.2-1.5, p < .0001). The cardiovascular disease analysis was further stratified by variant allele fraction (VAF) and gene, which showed a statistically significant association only with a VAF of ≥ 10% (HR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.24-1.62, p < .0001), as well as statistically significant associations for each gene examined with the largest magnitude of effect found for CH mutations in JAK2 (HR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.84-6.68, p < .0001). Analysis of the association of CH mutations with hematologic malignancy demonstrated a numeric stepwise increase in risk with increasing VAF thresholds. This analysis strongly supports the association of CH mutations with a clinically meaningful increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes among individuals without hematologic disease, particularly with increasing VAF thresholds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.