Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35015316›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of hematology2022

Association of clonal hematopoiesis mutations with clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Malgorzata K Nowakowska, Taebeom Kim, Mikayla T Thompson, Kelly L Bolton, Anita Deswal, Steven H Lin, Paul Scheet, Mackenzie R Wehner, Kevin T Nead

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Causes of Clonal Hematopoiesis: a Review.Current oncology reports · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Malgorzata K NowakowskaSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0001-5756-1878
Taebeom KimDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Mikayla T ThompsonSchool of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo.
Kelly L BoltonDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.
Anita DeswalDepartment of Cardiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Steven H LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Paul ScheetDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Mackenzie R WehnerDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Kevin T NeadDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Impact of clonal hematopoiesis mutations on toxicity and outcomes following oncologic therapyK08CA263313 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI NEAD, KEVIN THOMAS · 2021 to 2025
$1.2M
Impact of Oncologic Therapy on Clonal Hematopoiesis and Subsequent Risk of Therapy-Related LeukemiaK08CA241318 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BOLTON, KELLY LEIGH · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA241318NCI NIH HHS K08 CA263313NCI NIH HHS L30 CA253796NCI NIH HHS NCI K08CA263313NCI NIH HHS NCI L30CA253796NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) mutations are common among individuals without known hematologic disease. CH mutations have been associated with numerous adverse clinical outcomes across many different studies. We systematically reviewed the available literature for clinical outcomes associated with CH mutations in patients without hematologic disease. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus for eligible studies. Three investigators independently extracted the data, and each study was verified by a second author. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We identified 32 studies with 56 cohorts that examine the association between CH mutations and clinical outcomes. We conducted meta-analyses comparing outcomes among individuals with and without detectable CH mutations. We conducted meta-analyses for cardiovascular diseases (nine studies; HR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.26-2.07, p = .0002), hematologic malignancies (seven studies; HR = 5.59, 95% CI = 3.31-9.45, p < .0001), therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (four studies; HR = 7.55, 95% CI = 4.3-13.57, p < .001), and death (nine studies; HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.2-1.5, p < .0001). The cardiovascular disease analysis was further stratified by variant allele fraction (VAF) and gene, which showed a statistically significant association only with a VAF of ≥ 10% (HR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.24-1.62, p < .0001), as well as statistically significant associations for each gene examined with the largest magnitude of effect found for CH mutations in JAK2 (HR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.84-6.68, p < .0001). Analysis of the association of CH mutations with hematologic malignancy demonstrated a numeric stepwise increase in risk with increasing VAF thresholds. This analysis strongly supports the association of CH mutations with a clinically meaningful increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes among individuals without hematologic disease, particularly with increasing VAF thresholds.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryAllelesClonal HematopoiesisHematopoiesisHumansMutation

Identifiers

PMID35015316
PMCPMC9284564
OpenAlexW4205503064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.