ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Method for counting labeled neurons in mouse brain regions based on image representation and registration.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain-wide immunolabeling and tissue clearing applications for engram research.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2025Review
- Localization and Registration of 2D Histological Mouse Brain Images in 3D Atlas Space.Neuroinformatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An important step in brain image analysis is to divide specific brain regions by matching brain slices to standard brain reference atlases, and perform statistical analysis on the labeled neurons in each brain region. Taking mouse fluorescently labeled brain slices as an example, due to the noise and distortion introduced during the preparation of brain slices, and the modal differences with standard brain atlas, the brain slices cannot directly establish an accurate one-to-one correspondence with the brain atlas, which in turn affects the accuracy of the number of labeled neurons in each brain region. This paper introduces the idea of image representation, uses neural networks to realize the registration of different modal mouse brain slices and brain atlas, completes the regional localization of the brain slices, and uses threshold segmentation to detect and count the labeled neurons in each brain region. The method proposed in this paper can effectively solve the problem of large deviation of neurons count caused by the inaccurate division of brain regions in large deformed brain slices, and can automatically realize accurate count of labeled neurons in each brain region of brain slices. The whole framework of method for counting labeled neurons in mouse brain regions based on image representation and registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35015271What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.