Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35015269›Full record

ArticlePulmonary therapy2022

Treatment Transitions in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Retrospective Analyses of US and UK Healthcare Databases.

Chloe I Bloom, Jukka Montonen, Olaf Jöns, Elizabeth M Garry, Surya P Bhatt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chloe I BloomImperial College London, London, UK. chloe.bloom06@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1285-7602
Jukka MontonenBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Olaf JönsBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Elizabeth M GarryAetion Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Surya P BhattDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrevious studies have reported that more patients receive inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing therapies than would be expected based on exacerbation history, suggesting overprescribing. We aimed to describe patterns of treatment switching from first (1MT) to second maintenance therapy (2MT) among COPD patients in the US and UK.

methodsWe used healthcare data from the US IBM

resultsOverall, 7028 patients in the US and 2461 in the UK initiated 2MT within a median (IQR) 160.0 (76.0; 335.0) and 218.0 (86.0; 428.0) days after 1MT, respectively. In the US, 33.6% of patients initiating 2MT had no recorded exacerbations in the previous year, whereas 23.1% had one and 43.3% had ≥ 2. In the UK, 54.9% of patients had no recorded exacerbations in the previous year, whereas 20.9% had one and 24.2% had ≥ 2. At 2MT, most patients switched to LAMA/LABA/ICS (26.1%) or LABA/ICS (25.8%) in the US, and LAMA/LABA (39.4%) or LAMA/LABA/ICS (27.8%) in the UK; 62.2% (US) and 47.5% of patients (UK) were prescribed ICS-containing regimens. The most common treatment transition from 1MT to 2MT was LABA/ICS to LAMA/LABA/ICS (13.0%) in the US; and LAMA to LAMA/LABA (32.5%) and LAMA to LAMA/LABA/ICS (14.3%) in the UK.

conclusionsAt 2MT, the proportion of patients on LAMA/LABA/ICS was similar between the US and UK, but treatment pathways were different.

Indexed as

BronchodilatorsClinical guidelinesCOPDDatabaseInhaled corticosteroidLong-acting beta-agonistsLong-acting muscarinic antagonistsMaintenance therapyObservational studyTreatment switching

Identifiers

PMID35015269
PMCPMC8861248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.