Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35015202›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2022

Chronic migraine evolution after 3 months from erenumab suspension: real-world-evidence-life data.

Simona Guerzoni, Carlo Baraldi, Umberto Pensato, Valentina Favoni, Flavia Lo Castro, Maria Michela Cainazzo, Sabina Cevoli, Luca Pani

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Simona Guerzoni *Medical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Carlo Baraldi *PhD School in Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. infocarlobaraldi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8432-1888
Umberto PensatoPost-Graduate School of Neurology, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Valentina FavoniIRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Flavia Lo CastroPost-Graduate School of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Maria Michela CainazzoMedical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Sabina CevoliIRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Luca PaniMedical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITIstituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundErenumab is a monoclonal antibody acting against calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor which has been found effective even for the treatment of chronic migraine (CM) complicated with medication overuse headache (MOH). According to the present guidelines, the treatment with erenumab should continue for up to 1 year. The aim of the present study is to explore the evolution of patients affected by CM and MOH at the baseline, after erenumab discontinuation.

methodsOne hundred and eighty-five patients affected by CM and MOH were recruited and followed up after erenumab discontinuation. The number of migraine days per month, the number of painkillers taken per month, the number of days in which one medication was used for a month were collected every 30 days for the 3 months following erenumab suspension.

resultsAt the 3rd month after suspension, patients displayed a significantly higher number of migraine days per month, a significantly higher painkiller consumption, and a significantly higher migraine-related disability. A high body mass index and the presence of aura were positively correlated with the relapse of CM and MOH.

conclusionPatients affected by CM and MOH at the baseline displayed a significant worsening of their headaches after erenumab discontinuation.

Indexed as

Headache Disorders, SecondaryMigraine DisordersAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsHeadacheHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistserenumabAnalgesic consumptionChronic migraineErenumabMedication overuse headacheMigraine relapseNumber of headache days

Identifiers

PMID35015202
OpenAlexW4205148185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.