Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35015188›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2022

Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as a second-line treatment in HER2-positive gastric cancer: subgroup analysis of a nationwide, real-world study in Korea (KCSG-ST19-16).

Bum Jun Kim, Hee-Jung Jee, Sun Young Rha, Hye Sook Han, Min-Hee Ryu, Se Hoon Park, Jong Gwang Kim, Woo Kyun Bae, Keun-Wook Lee, Do-Youn Oh and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. HER2International journal of oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Bum Jun Kim *Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 14068, Republic of Korea.
Hee-Jung Jee *Department of Biostatistics, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong, Republic of Korea.
Sun Young Rha *Songdang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hye Sook HanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Min-Hee RyuDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Se Hoon ParkDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong Gwang KimDepartment of Oncology/Hematology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Woo Kyun BaeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Republic of Korea.
Keun-Wook LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82 Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Do-Youn OhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Hye ByunInnovation Research Department, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Wonju, Republic of Korea.
Dong Sook KimReview and Assessment Research Department, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Wonju, Republic of Korea.
Young Ju SuhDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Hyonggin AnDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dae Young ZangDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 14068, Republic of Korea. fhdzang@hallym.or.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-2602-7848
Hallym University Medical Center · KRHealth Insurance Review and Assessment Service · KRChonnam National University Hwasun Hospital · KRChungbuk National University · KRChungnam National University · KRInha University · KRKorea University · KRKyungpook National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSungkyunkwan University · KRUlsan College · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA subgroup analysis of data from a nationwide study (KCSG-ST19-16) was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line ramucirumab plus paclitaxel treatment in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

methodsThe KCSG-ST19-16 study enrolled a total of 1063 patients from 56 hospitals in South Korea with advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma, who had received second-line treatment with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel. HER2 status was known for 994 (93.5%) of these patients, who were thus included in the subgroup analysis.

resultsIn total, 163 of 994 patients (16.4%), had HER2-positive gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. The objective response rate to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel treatment was significantly higher in patients with HER2-positive disease compared to those with HER2-negative disease (23.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 15.9-30.1] vs. 15.1% [95% CI, 12.3-17.9], p = 0.025). The median progression-free survival was longer in patients with HER2-positive versus HER2-negative disease, but the difference was not statistically significant (4.3 months [95% CI, 3.7-5.3] vs 3.7 months [95% CI, 3.4-4.0], p = 0.054). There was no statistically significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between the groups (9.8 months [95% CI, 8.9-12.3] vs 10.1 months [95% CI, 9.2-10.9], p = 0.564).

conclusionsIn patients with HER2-positive gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma, the objective response rate to second-line treatment with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel was significantly higher compared to patients with HER2-negative disease. However, an increased response to treatment was not associated with an improvement in OS.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaStomach NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionHumansPaclitaxelRamucirumabRepublic of KoreaAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedPaclitaxelRamucirumabErbB-2PaclitaxelRamucirumabStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35015188
OpenAlexW4205433390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.