Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35014972›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Patients' Expectations and Experiences With a Mental Health-Focused Supportive Text Messaging Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation.

Reham Shalaby, Wesley Vuong, Ejemai Eboreime, Shireen Surood, Andrew J Greenshaw, Vincent Israel Opoku Agyapong

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03404882 (Enhancing Peer-support Experience for Patients Discharged From Acute Psychiatric Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03404882 nacompletednot on this map

Enhancing Peer-support Experience for Patients Discharged From Acute Psychiatric Care: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled182ConditionsDepression, Bipolar Disorder, SchizophreniaArmsSupportive/reminder text messaging plus peer support, Supportive/reminder text messaging, Peer support only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Reham ShalabyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3717-6398
Wesley VuongAddiction and Mental Health, Alberta Health services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8990-4804
Ejemai EboreimeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8277-2570
Shireen SuroodAddiction and Mental Health, Alberta Health services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9776-2348
Andrew J GreenshawDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9097-900X
Vincent Israel Opoku AgyapongDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2743-0372
University of Alberta · CAAlberta Health Services · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeb-based services are an economical and easily scalable means of support that uses existing technology. Text4Support is a supportive, complementary text messaging service that supports people with different mental health conditions after they are discharged from inpatient psychiatric care.

objectiveIn this study, we aim to assess user satisfaction with the Text4Support service to gain a better understanding of subscribers' experiences.

methodsThis was a mixed methods study using secondary data from a pilot observational controlled trial. The trial included 181 patients discharged from acute psychiatric care and distributed into 4 randomized groups. Out of the 4 study groups in the initial study, 2 groups who received supportive text messages (89/181, 49.2% of patients), either alone or alongside a peer support worker, were included. Thematic and descriptive analyses were also performed. Differences in feedback based on sex at birth and primary diagnosis were determined using univariate analysis. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (trial registration number: NCT03404882).

resultsOut of 89 participants, 36 (40%) completed the follow-up survey. The principal findings were that Text4Support was well perceived with a high satisfaction rate either regarding the feedback of the messages or their perceived impact. Meanwhile, there was no statistically significant difference between satisfactory items based on the subscriber's sex at birth or primary diagnosis. The patients' initial expectations were either neutral or positive in relation to the expected nature or the impact of the text messages received on their mental well-being. In addition, the subscribers were satisfied with the frequency of the messages, which were received once daily for 6 consecutive months. The participants recommended more personalized messages or mutual interaction with health care personnel.

conclusionsText4Support was generally well perceived by patients after hospital discharge, regardless of their sex at birth or mental health diagnosis. Further personalization and interactive platforms were recommended by participants that may need to be considered when designing similar future services.

Indexed as

mental healthmixed methodspatients’ experiencesupportive text messages

Identifiers

PMID35014972
PMCPMC8790698
OpenAlexW3214075475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.