Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35014958›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2022

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Physical Activity Tracker and Text Messages to Promote Physical Activity During Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (Smart Pace II).

Erin L Van Blarigan, Anand Dhruva, Chloe E Atreya, Stacey A Kenfield, June M Chan, Alexandra Milloy, Iris Kim, Paige Steiding, Angela Laffan, Li Zhang and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03524716 (Self-monitoring and Reminder Texts to Increase Physical Activity After Cancer II), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03524716 nacompletednot on this map

Self-monitoring and Reminder Texts to Increase Physical Activity After Cancer II (Smart Pace II)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2018 to 2020Enrolled44ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Colon Cancer, Rectal CancerArmsFitbit and Text Messages
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effects of internet-based digital health interventions on the physical activity and quality of life of colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin L Van BlariganDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5079-3385
Anand DhruvaOsher Center for Integrative Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5552-7131
Chloe E AtreyaDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2954-1727
Stacey A KenfieldDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1585-7352
June M ChanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7620-569X
Alexandra MilloyHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9085-9112
Iris KimUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7023-2411
Paige SteidingHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5938-9896
Angela LaffanHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1180-1893
Li ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9242-0763
Sorbarikor PiawahDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1655-6113
Yoshimi FukuokaSchool of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2245-9264
Christine MiaskowskiSchool of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5170-2027
Frederick M HechtOsher Center for Integrative Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5782-1171
Mi-Ok KimDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7712-3653
Alan P VenookDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9749-6548
Katherine Van LoonDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-4114
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

UCSF Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK098722 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SUNEIL Krishna KOLIWAD · 2015 to 2026
$14.6M
Mentoring and Research in Integrative MedicineK24AT007827 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HECHT, FREDERICK M · 2013 to 2022
$1.8M
Diet After Colorectal Cancer : Observational Studies to Behavioral InterventionsK07CA197077 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VAN BLARIGAN, ERIN LYNN · 2016 to 2020
$885k
NCCIH NIH HHS K24 AT007827NCI NIH HHS K07 CA197077NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK098722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe conducted a pilot 2-arm randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility of a digital health intervention to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) during chemotherapy.

objectiveThis study aimed to determine whether a digital health physical activity intervention is feasible and acceptable during chemotherapy for CRC.

methodsPotentially eligible patients with CRC expected to receive at least 12 weeks of chemotherapy were identified in person at the University of California, San Francisco, and on the web through advertising. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to a 12-week intervention (Fitbit Flex, automated SMS text messages) versus usual care. At 0 and 12 weeks, patients wore an Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer for 7 days and completed surveys, body size measurements, and an optional 6-minute walk test. Participants could not be masked to their intervention arm, but people assessing the body size and 6-minute walk test outcomes were masked. The primary outcomes were adherence (eg, Fitbit wear and text response rate) and self-assessed acceptability of the intervention. The intervention would be considered feasible if we observed at least 80% complete follow-up and 70% adherence and satisfaction, a priori.

resultsFrom 2018 to 2020, we screened 240 patients; 53.3% (128/240) of patients were ineligible and 26.7% (64/240) declined to participate. A total of 44 patients (44/240, 18%) were randomized to the intervention (n=22) or control (n=22) groups. Of these, 57% (25/44) were women; 68% (30/44) identified as White and 25% (11/44) identified as Asian American or Pacific Islander; and 77% (34/44) had a 4-year college degree. The median age at enrollment was 54 years (IQR 45-62 years). Follow-up at 12 weeks was 91% (40/44) complete. In the intervention arm, patients wore Fitbit devices on a median of 67 out of 84 (80%) study days and responded to a median of 17 out of 27 (63%) questions sent via SMS text message. Among 19 out of 22 (86%) intervention patients who completed the feedback survey, 89% (17/19) were satisfied with the Fitbit device; 63% (12/19) were satisfied with the SMS text messages; 68% (13/19) said the SMS text messages motivated them to exercise; 74% (14/19) said the frequency of SMS text messages (1-3 days) was ideal; and 79% (15/19) said that receiving SMS text messages in the morning and evening was ideal.

conclusionsThis pilot study demonstrated that many people receiving chemotherapy for CRC are interested in participating in digital health physical activity interventions. Fitbit adherence was high; however, participants indicated a desire for more tailored SMS text message content. Studies with more socioeconomically diverse patients with CRC are required.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03524716; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03524716.

Indexed as

colon cancerdigital healthexerciserectal cancerSMStreatmentwearables

Identifiers

PMID35014958
PMCPMC8790683
OpenAlexW4205844265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.