Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35014955›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022

Online Patient Education Materials Related to Lipoprotein(a): Readability Assessment.

Keon Pearson, Summer Ngo, Eson Ekpo, Ashish Sarraju, Grayson Baird, Joshua Knowles, Fatima Rodriguez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessing the understandability and actionability of online resources for patients undergoing hemodialysis.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Lipoprotein(a): An important piece of the ASCVD risk factor puzzle across diverse populations.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Accuracy and comprehensibility of chat-based artificial intelligence for patient information on atrial fibrillation and cardiac implantable electronic devices.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Keon Pearson *Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8861-9179
Summer Ngo *Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7434-4143
Eson EkpoDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0958-9854
Ashish SarrajuDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1649-2110
Grayson BairdRhode Island Hospital and Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5926-9886
Joshua KnowlesDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1922-7240
Fatima RodriguezDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5226-0723
Cardiovascular Institute of the South · USStanford University · USBrown University · US

Funding

SURPASS: (Statin Use and Risk Prediction of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in minority Subgroups)K01HL144607 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RODRIGUEZ, FATIMA · 2019 to 2023
$856k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL144607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a highly proatherogenic lipid fraction that is a clinically significant risk modifier. Patients wanting to learn more about Lp(a) are likely to use online patient educational materials (OPEMs). However, the readability of OPEMs may exceed the health literacy of the public.

objectiveThis study aims to assess the readability of OPEMs related to Lp(a). We hypothesized that the readability of these online materials would exceed the sixth grade level recommended by the American Medical Association.

methodsUsing an online search engine, we queried the top 20 search results from 10 commonly used Lp(a)-related search terms to identify a total of 200 websites. We excluded duplicate websites, advertised results, research journal articles, or non-patient-directed materials, such as those intended only for health professionals or researchers. Grade level readability was calculated using 5 standard readability metrics (automated readability index, SMOG index, Coleman-Liau index, Gunning Fog score, Flesch-Kincaid score) to produce robust point (mean) and interval (CI) estimates of readability. Generalized estimating equations were used to model grade level readability by each search term, with the 5 readability scores nested within each OPEM.

resultsA total of 27 unique websites were identified for analysis. The average readability score for the aggregated results was a 12.2 (95% CI 10.9798-13.3978) grade level. OPEMs were grouped into 6 categories by primary source: industry, lay press, research foundation and nonprofit organizations, university or government, clinic, and other. The most readable category was OPEMs published by universities or government agencies (9.0, 95% CI 6.8-11.3). The least readable OPEMs on average were the ones published by the lay press (13.0, 95% CI 11.2-14.8). All categories exceeded the sixth grade reading level recommended by the American Medical Association.

conclusionsLack of access to readable OPEMs may disproportionately affect patients with low health literacy. Ensuring that online content is understandable by broad audiences is a necessary component of increasing the impact of novel therapeutics and recommendations regarding Lp(a).

Indexed as

ComprehensionHealth LiteracyHumansInternetLipoprotein(a)Patient Education as TopicSearch EngineUnited StatesLipoprotein(a)health educationhealth literacylipoprotein(a)online patient education materialreadability

Identifiers

PMID35014955
PMCPMC8790699
OpenAlexW3210682857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.