Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35014852›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Ten-Year Cardiovascular Disease Risk Trajectories by Obstetric History: A Longitudinal Study in the Norwegian HUNT Study.

Abigail Fraser, Amanda R Markovitz, Eirin B Haug, Julie Horn, Pål Richard Romundstad, Håvard Dalen, Janet Rich-Edwards, Bjørn Olav Åsvold

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The value of pregnancy-related factors in the prediction of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Postpartum and interpregnancy care of women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Abigail FraserPopulation Health Sciences Bristol Medical School University of Bristol Bristol UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7741-9470
Amanda R MarkovitzDepartment of Epidemiology Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Boston MA.ORCID 0000-0003-0376-4375
Eirin B HaugPopulation Health Sciences Bristol Medical School University of Bristol Bristol UK.
Julie HornHUNT Research Center Department of Public Health and Nursing NTNUNorwegian University of Science and Technology Levanger Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1344-9707
Pål Richard RomundstadDepartment of Public Health and Nursing NTNUNorwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2061-4336
Håvard DalenDepartment of Medicine Levanger HospitalNord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust Levanger Norway.
Janet Rich-EdwardsDepartment of Epidemiology Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Boston MA.ORCID 0000-0001-5066-8808
Bjørn Olav ÅsvoldK.G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology Department of Public Health and Nursing NTNUNorwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3837-2101
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Predoctoral Training Program in Reproductive, Perinatal & Pediatric EpidemiologyT32HD060454 · NICHD · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI MICHELS, KARIN B · 2010 to 2014
$1.1M
Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/6Medical Research Council MR/M009351/1NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD060454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Women with a history of obstetric complications are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, but whether they should be specifically targeted for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk screening is unknown. Methods and Results We used linked data from the Norwegian HUNT (Trøndelag Health) Study and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway to create a population-based, prospective cohort of parous women. Using an established CVD risk prediction model (A Norwegian risk model for cardiovascular disease), we predicted 10-year risk of CVD (nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, and nonfatal or fatal stroke) based on established risk factors (age, systolic blood pressure, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking, antihypertensive use, and family history of myocardial infarction). Predicted 10-year CVD risk scores in women aged between 40 and 60 years were consistently higher in those with a history of obstetric complications. For example, when aged 40 years, women with a history of preeclampsia had a 0.06 percentage point higher mean risk score than women with all normotensive deliveries, and when aged 60 years this difference was 0.86. However, the differences in the proportion of women crossing established clinical thresholds for counseling and treatment in women with and without a complication were modest. Conclusions Findings do not support targeting parous women with a history of pregnancy complications for CVD screening. However, pregnancy complications identify women who would benefit from primordial and primary prevention efforts such as encouraging and supporting behavioral changes to reduce CVD risk in later life.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMyocardial InfarctionPregnancy ComplicationsAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedPregnancyProspective StudiesRisk Factorscardiovascular diseaselarge for gestational agepreeclampsiapregnancypreterm birthsmall for gestational agewomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID35014852
PMCPMC9238539
OpenAlexW4206026438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.