ArticleeLife2022
Humans optimally anticipate and compensate for an uneven step during walking.
Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergy of postural adaptation and exteroception for robust CPG-driven quadrupedal locomotion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A low-cost markerless motion capture system to automate functional gait assessment: Feasibility study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Natural visually guided behavior.Brain research · 2025Article
- Precise limb-speed afference reveals rhythmogenic drive modality and declines with age.Research square · 2025Article
- Correlates of gait speed changes during uneven terrain walking in older adults: differential roles of cognitive and sensorimotor function.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Behavioural energetics in human locomotion: how energy use influences how we move.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Review
- Electrical brain activity during human walking with parametric variations in terrain unevenness and walking speed.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Neuromechanical Strategies for Obstacle Negotiation during Overground Locomotion following Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury in Adult Cats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Humans plan for the near future to walk economically on uneven terrain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Article
- A biomechanics dataset of healthy human walking at various speeds, step lengths and step widths.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Evaluating anticipatory control strategies for their capability to cope with step-down perturbations in computer simulations of human walking.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Deep reinforcement learning for modeling human locomotion control in neuromechanical simulation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The simple task of walking up a sidewalk curb is actually a dynamic prediction task. The curb is a disturbance that could cause a loss of momentum if not anticipated and compensated for. It might be possible to adjust momentum sufficiently to ensure undisturbed time of arrival, but there are infinite possible ways to do so. Much of steady, level gait is determined by energy economy, which should be at least as important with terrain disturbances. It is, however, unknown whether economy also governs walking up a curb, and whether anticipation helps. Here, we show that humans compensate with an anticipatory pattern of forward speed adjustments, predicted by a criterion of minimizing mechanical energy input. The strategy is mechanistically predicted by optimal control for a simple model of bipedal walking dynamics, with each leg's push-off work as input. Optimization predicts a triphasic trajectory of speed (and thus momentum) adjustments, including an anticipatory phase. In experiment, human subjects ascend an artificial curb with the predicted triphasic trajectory, which approximately conserves overall walking speed relative to undisturbed flat ground. The trajectory involves speeding up in a few steps before the curb, losing considerable momentum from ascending it, and then regaining speed in a few steps thereafter. Descending the curb entails a nearly opposite, but still anticipatory, speed fluctuation trajectory, in agreement with model predictions that speed fluctuation amplitudes should scale linearly with curb height. The fluctuation amplitudes also decrease slightly with faster average speeds, also as predicted by model. Humans can reason about the dynamics of walking to plan anticipatory and economical control, even with a sidewalk curb in the way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.