Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35014609›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Humans optimally anticipate and compensate for an uneven step during walking.

Osman Darici, Arthur D Kuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Natural visually guided behavior.Brain research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Neuromechanical Strategies for Obstacle Negotiation during Overground Locomotion following Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury in Adult Cats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Humans plan for the near future to walk economically on uneven terrain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Osman DariciFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6217-5656
Arthur D KuoFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Funding

Field-Based Gait Monitoring System for the ElderlyR44AG030815 · NIA · INTELLIGENT PROSTHETIC SYSTEMS, LLC · PI ADAMCZYK, PETER G · 2010 to 2011
$856k
Field Based Gait Monitoring System For the ElderlyR43AG030815 · NIA · INTELLIGENT PROSTHETIC SYSTEMS, LLC · PI COLLINS, STEVEN H · 2007 to 2007
$100k
NIA NIH HHS R43 AG030815NIA NIH HHS R44 AG030815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The simple task of walking up a sidewalk curb is actually a dynamic prediction task. The curb is a disturbance that could cause a loss of momentum if not anticipated and compensated for. It might be possible to adjust momentum sufficiently to ensure undisturbed time of arrival, but there are infinite possible ways to do so. Much of steady, level gait is determined by energy economy, which should be at least as important with terrain disturbances. It is, however, unknown whether economy also governs walking up a curb, and whether anticipation helps. Here, we show that humans compensate with an anticipatory pattern of forward speed adjustments, predicted by a criterion of minimizing mechanical energy input. The strategy is mechanistically predicted by optimal control for a simple model of bipedal walking dynamics, with each leg's push-off work as input. Optimization predicts a triphasic trajectory of speed (and thus momentum) adjustments, including an anticipatory phase. In experiment, human subjects ascend an artificial curb with the predicted triphasic trajectory, which approximately conserves overall walking speed relative to undisturbed flat ground. The trajectory involves speeding up in a few steps before the curb, losing considerable momentum from ascending it, and then regaining speed in a few steps thereafter. Descending the curb entails a nearly opposite, but still anticipatory, speed fluctuation trajectory, in agreement with model predictions that speed fluctuation amplitudes should scale linearly with curb height. The fluctuation amplitudes also decrease slightly with faster average speeds, also as predicted by model. Humans can reason about the dynamics of walking to plan anticipatory and economical control, even with a sidewalk curb in the way.

Indexed as

GaitWalkingBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMotionbipedal walkingcentral nervous systemcontrolhumanphysics of living systems

Identifiers

PMID35014609
PMCPMC8920505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.