Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35014207›Full record

SynthesisClinical and experimental dental research2022

Implant-supported removable partial dentures compared to conventional dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life, patient satisfaction, and biomechanical complications.

Octave N Bandiaky, Dohoue L Lokossou, Assem Soueidan, Pierre Le Bars, Moctar Gueye, Elhadj B Mbodj, Laurent Le Guéhennec

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06150768 (Biting Force and Quality of Life in Porcelain-fused-to Metal Versus Zirconia Implant- Supported in Mandibular Kennedy Class II), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06150768 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Biting Force and Quality of Life in Porcelain-fused-to Metal Versus Zirconia Implant- Supported in Mandibular Kennedy Class II ( In Vivo Study )

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled33ConditionsPartial Edentulism Class II, Dental Implants, ImplantArmsCobalt Chromium Removable Partial Denture, Implant-Supported Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal-Fixed Partial Denture, Implant-Supported Zirconia Fixed Partial Denture.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Octave N BandiakyDivision of Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6556-1947
Dohoue L LokossouSchool of Dentistry, University of El Hadji Ibrahima Niasse, Dakar, Sénégal.
Assem SoueidanDepartment of Periodontology, Rmes U1229, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Pierre Le BarsDivision of Fixed Prosthodontics, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Moctar GueyeDepartment of Odontology, Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Dakar, Dakar, Senegal.
Elhadj B MbodjDepartment of Odontology, Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Dakar, Dakar, Senegal.
Laurent Le GuéhennecDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Cheikh Anta Diop University · SNNantes Université · FRLaboratoire de Thermique et Energie de Nantes · FRRMeS - Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton

Funding

None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare implant-supported removable partial dentures (ISRPDs) with distal extension removable partial dentures (DERPDs) in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs: patients' quality of life and satisfaction) and to determine mechanical and biological complications associated with ISRPDs. MATERIAL AND

methodsAn electronic search was performed on four databases to identify studies treating Kennedy class I or II edentulous patients and which compared ISRPDs with DERPDs in terms of PROMS and studies, which evaluated mechanical and biological complications associated ISRPDs. Two authors independently extracted data on quality of life, patient satisfaction, and biomechanical complications from these studies. The risk of bias was assessed for each study, and for PROMs, the authors performed a meta-analysis by using a random-effects model.

resultsThirteen articles were included based on the selection criteria. The difference in mean scores for quality of life (30.5 ± 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.9-36.1) and patient satisfaction (-20.8 ± 0.2; 95% CI, -23.7 to -17.8) between treatments with conventional and implant-supported removable dentures was statistically significant (p < .05). Implant-supported removable dentures improved patients' overall quality of life and satisfaction. Some mechanical and biological complications, such as clasp adjustment, abutment or implant loosening, marginal bone resorption, and peri-implant mucositis, were noted in ISRPDs during patient follow-up. Studies assessing PROMs were very heterogeneous (I

conclusionsISRPDs significantly improved quality of life and patient satisfaction. Some mechanical and biological complications have been associated with ISRPDs treatment, requiring regular monitoring of patients to avoid the occurrence of these complications.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsDenture, Partial, RemovableDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedHumansPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeDental Implantsimplant-supported removable partial denturespatient's satisfactionquality of liferemovable partial denture

Identifiers

PMID35014207
PMCPMC8874059
OpenAlexW4205121804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.