Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35014204›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2022

Designer Extracellular Vesicles Modulate Pro-Neuronal Cell Responses and Improve Intracranial Retention.

Lilibeth Ortega-Pineda, Alec Sunyecz, Ana I Salazar-Puerta, Maria Angelica Rincon-Benavides, Diego Alzate-Correa, Amrita Lakshmi Anaparthi, Elizabeth Guilfoyle, Louisa Mezache, Heather L Struckman, Silvia Duarte-Sanmiguel and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Hydrogel-based neural engineering for skin wound healing.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lilibeth Ortega-PinedaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Alec SunyeczDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Ana I Salazar-PuertaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Maria Angelica Rincon-BenavidesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Diego Alzate-CorreaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Amrita Lakshmi AnaparthiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Elizabeth GuilfoyleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Louisa MezacheDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Heather L StruckmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Silvia Duarte-SanmiguelDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Binbin DengCenter for Electron Microscopy and Analysis (CEMAS), The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.
David W McCombCenter for Electron Microscopy and Analysis (CEMAS), The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.
Daniel J DoddBiomedical Science Graduate Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
William R LawrenceBiomedical Science Graduate Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Jordan MooreDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Jingjing ZhangWilliam G. Lowrie Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Eduardo ReáteguiWilliam G. Lowrie Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Rengasayee VeeraraghavanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
M Tyler NelsonAir Force Research Laboratory, 711th Human Performance Wing, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433, USA.
Daniel Gallego-PerezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Natalia Higuita-CastroDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3297-6281
The Ohio State University · USWright-Patterson Air Force Base · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer A. Woyach · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Novel nanoscale approaches to whole tissue reprogrammingDP2EB028110 · NIBIB · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GALLEGO-PEREZ, DANIEL · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
Non-Viral Modulation of Cutaneous Tissue Plasticity as a Therapy for DiabetesDP1DK126199 · NIDDK · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GALLEGO-PEREZ, DANIEL · 2020 to 2020
$737k
Non-viral Reprogramming of Intervertebral Disc Cells for the treatment of Discogenic back painR61AR076786 · NIAMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HIGUITA-CASTRO, NATALIA, PURMESSUR (WALTER), DEVINA · 2019 to 2019
$368k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NIAMS NIH HHS R61 AR076786NIBIB NIH HHS DP2 EB028110NIDDK NIH HHS DP1 DK126199NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIH HHS DP1DK126199NIH HHS DP2EB028110NIH HHS R61AR076786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene/oligonucleotide therapies have emerged as a promising strategy for the treatment of different neurological conditions. However, current methodologies for the delivery of neurogenic/neurotrophic cargo to brain and nerve tissue are fraught with caveats, including reliance on viral vectors, potential toxicity, and immune/inflammatory responses. Moreover, delivery to the central nervous system is further compounded by the low permeability of the blood brain barrier. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as promising delivery vehicles for neurogenic/neurotrophic therapies, overcoming many of the limitations mentioned above. However, the manufacturing processes used for therapeutic EVs remain poorly understood. Here, we conducted a detailed study of the manufacturing process of neurogenic EVs by characterizing the nature of cargo and surface decoration, as well as the transfer dynamics across donor cells, EVs, and recipient cells. Neurogenic EVs loaded with Ascl1, Brn2, and Myt1l (ABM) are found to show enhanced neuron-specific tropism, modulate electrophysiological activity in neuronal cultures, and drive pro-neurogenic conversions/reprogramming. Moreover, murine studies demonstrate that surface decoration with glutamate receptors appears to mediate enhanced EV delivery to the brain. Altogether, the results indicate that ABM-loaded designer EVs can be a promising platform nanotechnology to drive pro-neuronal responses, and that surface functionalization with glutamate receptors can facilitate the deployment of EVs to the brain.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierCell CommunicationCentral Nervous SystemMiceNeuronsfunctionalized extracellular vesiclesgene/oligonucleotide therapiesnanocarriersneurogenic extracellular vesiclestherapeutic designer extracellular vesicles

Identifiers

PMID35014204
PMCPMC9466406
OpenAlexW4206636092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.