Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35014190›Full record

ArticleMolecular informatics2022

Antibacterial Activity Prediction of Plant Secondary Metabolites Based on a Combined Approach of Graph Clustering and Deep Neural Network.

Mohammad Bozlul Karim, Shigehiko Kanaya, Md Altaf-Ul-Amin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammad Bozlul KarimComputational Systems Biology Lab. NAIST, Ikoma, 630-0129, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2316-5599
Shigehiko KanayaComputational Systems Biology Lab. NAIST, Ikoma, 630-0129, Japan.
Md Altaf-Ul-AminComputational Systems Biology Lab. NAIST, Ikoma, 630-0129, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plants produce numerous types of secondary metabolites which have pharmacological importance in drug development for different diseases. Computational methods widely use the fingerprints of the metabolites to understand different properties and similarities among metabolites and for the prediction of chemical reactions etc. In this work, we developed three different deep neural network models (DNN) to predict the antibacterial property of plant metabolites. We developed the first DNN model using the fingerprint set of metabolites as features. In the second DNN model, we searched the similarities among fingerprints using correlation and used one representative feature from each group of highly correlated fingerprints. In the third model, the fingerprints of metabolites were used to find structurally similar chemical compound clusters. Form each cluster a representative metabolite is selected and made part of the training dataset. The second model reduced the number of features where the third model achieved better classification results for test data. In both cases, we applied the simple graph clustering method to cluster the corresponding network. The correlation-based DNN model reduced some features while retaining an almost similar performance compared to the first DNN model. The third model improves classification results for test data by capturing wider variance within training data using graph clustering method. This third model is somewhat novel approach and can be applied to build DNN models for other purposes.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsNeural Networks, ComputerCluster AnalysisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibacterialClusterDNNFingerprintGraphMetabolite

Identifiers

PMID35014190
PMCPMC9400908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.